In a shipyard in Germany, Blohm & Voss workers are building a mammoth yacht called the Eclipse.
Like many things in the secretive world of superyachts, its exact length is hard to pin down. So is the name of its owner and the cost of building it.
But according to the Web site of The Yacht Report, one of several publications that track yachting with the same intensity that gossip magazines cover Hollywood hunks, the Eclipse is 162m long.
That's 2m longer than the Dubai, an 11,600-tonne behemoth that now holds the record as the world's largest yacht. Its owner is the ruler of Dubai, Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum.
The extra length on the Eclipse isn't an accident. Supersized yachts are the latest examples of one-upmanship among billionaires, many of whom already own a private jet, a Rolls-Royce or two, and multiple mansions.
Despite fear of an economic recession and unrelenting job pressures among those who remain yachtless, there's still a lot of money floating around the world. And as the superrich get richer, the size of yachts grows bigger and bigger, too.
"When a yacht is over 328 feet [100m], it's so big that you lose the intimacy," says Tork Buckley, editor of The Yacht Report. "On the other hand, you've got bragging rights. No question, that's a very strong part of the motivation."
Who will be the one to wrest bragging rights from the sheik? Blohm & Voss, a leading shipbuilder, isn't saying. An executive at a different yacht company, who requested anonymity because he was concerned about losing clients, said it was being built for Roman Abramovich, a Russian tycoon.
Abramovich already owns the 86m Ecstasea and the 115m Pelorus, and Web sites that track yachts speculate that he may be the owner of a new 120m yacht called Sigma that resembles a battleship. A spokesman for Abramovich declined to comment.
Just four years ago, when Oracle Corp CEO Lawrence Ellison took possession of the 138m Rising Sun, he gained crowing rights over Paul Allen, the Microsoft co-founder. Allen's yacht, the Octopus, is relatively minuscule at 127m. (Since then, Hollywood mogul David Geffen has bought a 50 percent share of the Rising Sun from Ellison.)
Many yacht owners are entrepreneurs or industrialists, rather than royalty or bold-faced names from Silicon Valley, yacht designers and builders said.
"One of my clients is a woman who started her own business and ended up making cocktail-type quiches sold through Costco and Wal-Mart," said Douglas Sharp, who owns a yacht design company in San Diego.
Like Abramovich, a growing number of yacht buyers are from emerging markets.
"There's an incredible amount of disposable money in the world at the moment, and a lot of money is coming out of new markets like Russia and Ukraine, as well as India," says Jonathan Beckett, chief executive of Burgess, a company that helps owners build and charter yachts. "These people have made a lot of money very quickly and have an appetite."
According to ShowBoats International, a luxury yacht magazine, 916 yachts measuring 24m or longer -- the traditional definition of a superyacht -- were on order or under construction as of Sept. 1, four times the number in 1997. The biggest gains were among the biggest yachts: 47 yachts were 61m to 75.9m long, up 68 percent from a year earlier, while 23 were 76.2m or longer, an increase of 28 percent.
"When I started in the early 1970s, a 60-foot [18m] boat was considered pretty large," Sharp said. "A 150-foot [46m] boat was queen of the show in Monaco in 1982. In 2008, you wouldn't be able to find that boat in the marina."
Some new megayachts are so big that they have to dock in commercial ports. The growth in the number and size of yachts is also making it hard to find qualified crew members.
Still, many yacht owners trade in their boats every few years for bigger models.
"People want more toys to play with. That's something that drives it," says Wim Koersvelt, director of Icon Yachts in the Netherlands. "Gyms were unusual 20 years ago, and no yacht is being built now without a gym. They're buying two to four-person submarines, have four Jet Skis and little sailboats stored on board, as well as helicopter landing pads."
It takes two to four years to build a yacht, and prices are rising so quickly that some owners are selling their boats before they're even finished -- for a tidy profit. Beckett of Burgess says prices have risen 10 percent to 20 percent in the past two years alone. He estimates that a yacht 100m long would cost about US$230 million today, with prices rising to US$650 million for a 152m yacht.
Some owners recoup part of their costs by chartering their yachts. Want to sail the Maltese Falcon, the innovative clipper ship built by Tom Perkins, the Silicon Valley venture capitalist? That will put you back around US$539,000 to US$555,000 a week, not counting expenses for fuel, food or crew. Or the Mirabella V, the elegant sloop owned by Joe Vittoria, the former chief executive of Avis Rent A Car System? That's US$325,000 to US$375,000 a week, depending on the season.
There are no signs that demand will slacken. "There are 2,000 superyachts in the world today" over 120 feet long, "and nearly 200,000 people who could afford to buy them," Beckett says.
The arms race in yachts echoes the competition among business titans in the last century to build the world's tallest skyscraper. In his book Mine's Bigger, David Kaplan describes the battle between Perkins and Jim Clark, the cofounder of three Silicon Valley companies, including Netscape, as they competed to build the world's biggest sailing megayacht.
By the time Perkins completed his Maltese Falcon, measuring 88m, in 2006, it was substantially longer than Clark's Athena if measured at the water line.
"Clark could console himself only with the fact that if you included his 33-foot [10m] stainless steel bowsprit as part of the length, then his was bigger than anybody else's," Kaplan writes.
Vittoria holds a different record. His 247-foot Mirabella V has a 89m mast -- so tall that it can't fit under the Golden Gate Bridge.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath