Less than a week after the arrogance of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was exposed for all to see as they put partisanship and self-interest above the well-being of the nation by blocking sunshine bills and busting a deal with the Non-Partisan Solidarity Union, the public on Wednesday was again offered a shocking example of how a political party's comfortable control of a two-thirds majority in the Legislative Yuan is slowly boosting the self-importance of its lawmakers.
Accusing the state-run First Commercial Bank of waiving the lease on Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (
The lawmakers ignored a security guard's query and went straight to the campaign office on the 13th floor, sparking verbal and physical clashes with DPP supporters.
Although police were called in to maintain order and did remove the lawmakers for trespassing on private property, they nevertheless did not apprehend them according to Article 306 of the Criminal Code (
In contrast, DPP supporters, who were trying to prevent the lawmakers from fleeing the "crime scene," were manhandled by the police.
Granted, lawmakers have a right to conduct inspections in accordance with the Law Governing Legislators' Exercise of Power (
The presidential election is less than 10 days away. What were these four lawmakers thinking? With feelings running high in both camps, even a fool should know better than to step on opposition territory with such aggression.
Aware of the potential damage from the incident, KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Meanwhile, on the day of the incident, there were allegations in a magazine that KMT Legislator Diane Lee (
Lawmakers are elected to work for the common good of the people. It seems that certain lawmakers more often than not are troublemakers themselves, however, and have a hard time abiding by the laws they themselves brought into being.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military