Steve Marshall is a British travel agent. He lives in Spain, and he sells trips to Europeans who want to go to sunny places, including Cuba. In October, about 80 of his Web sites stopped working, thanks to the US government.
The sites, in English, French and Spanish, had been online since 1998. Some, like www.cuba-hemingway.com, were literary. Others, such as www.cuba-havanacity.com, discussed Cuban history and culture. Still others -- www.bonjourcuba.com and www.ciaocuba.com -- were purely commercial sites aimed at Italian and French tourists.
"I came to work in the morning, and we had no reservations at all," Marshall said on the phone from the Canary Islands. "We thought it was a technical problem."
It turned out, though, that Marshall's Web sites had been put on a US Treasury Department blacklist and, as a consequence, his US domain name registrar, eNom Inc, had disabled them. Marshall said eNom told him it did so after a call from the Treasury Department; the company, based in Bellevue, Washington, says it learned that the sites were on the blacklist through a blog.
Either way, there is no dispute that eNom shut down Marshall's sites without notifying him and has refused to release the domain names to him. In effect, Marshall said, eNom has taken his property and interfered with his business. He has slowly rebuilt his Web business over the last several months, and now many of the same sites operate with the suffix .net rather than .com, through a European registrar. His servers, he said, have been in the Bahamas all along.
Marshall said he did not understand "how Web sites owned by a British national operating via a Spanish travel agency can be affected by US law."
Worse, he said, "these days not even a judge is required for the US government to censor online materials."
A Treasury spokesman, John Rankin, referred a caller to a press release issued in December 2004, almost three years before eNom acted. It said Marshall's company had helped Americans evade restrictions on travel to Cuba and was "a generator of resources that the Cuban regime uses to oppress its people." It added that US companies must not only stop doing business with the company but also freeze its assets, meaning that eNom did exactly what it was legally required to do.
Marshall said he was uninterested in US tourists.
"They can't go anyway," he said.
Peter Fitzgerald, a law professor at Stetson University in Florida who has studied the blacklist -- which the Treasury calls a list of "specially designated nationals" -- said its operation was quite mysterious.
"There really is no explanation or standard," he said, "for why someone gets on the list."
Susan Crawford, a visiting law professor at Yale and a leading authority on Internet law, said the fact that many large domain name registrars are based in the US gives the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, control "over a great deal of speech -- none of which may be actually hosted in the US, about the US or conflicting with any US rights."
"OFAC apparently has the power to order that this speech disappear," Crawford said.
The law under which the Treasury Department is acting has an exemption, known as the Berman Amendment, which seeks to protect "information or informational materials." Marshall's Web sites, though ultimately commercial, would seem to qualify, and it is not clear why they appear on the list. Unlike Americans, who face significant restrictions on travel to Cuba, Europeans are free to go there, and many do. Charles Sims, a lawyer with Proskauer Rose in New York, said the Treasury Department might have gone too far in Marshall's case.
"The US can certainly criminalize the expenditure of money by US citizens in Cuba," Sims said. "But it doesn't properly have any jurisdiction over foreign sites that are not targeted at the US and which are lawful under foreign law."
Rankin said Marshall was free to ask for a review of his case.
"If they want to be taken off the list," Rankin said, "they should contact us to make their case."
That is a problematic system, Fitzgerald said.
"The way to get off the list," he said, "is to go back to the same bureaucrat who put you on."
Last March, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights issued a disturbing report on the OFAC list. Its subtitle: "How a Treasury Department Terrorist Watch List Ensnares Everyday Consumers."
The report, by Shirin Sinnar, said there were 6,400 names on the list and that, like no-fly lists at airports, it gave rise to endless and serious problems of mistaken identity.
"Financial institutions, credit bureaus, charities, car dealerships, health insurers, landlords and employers are now checking names against the list before they open an account, close a sale, rent an apartment or offer a job," it said.
But Marshall's case does not appear to be one of mistaken identity. The government quite specifically intended to interfere with his business.
That, Crawford said, is a scandal.
"The way we communicate these days is through domain names, and the Treasury Department should not be interfering with domain names just as it does not interfere with telecommunications lines," Crawford said.
Curiously, the Treasury has not shut down all of Marshall's .com sites. You can still find, for now, www.cuba-guantanamo.com.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS