Steve Marshall is a British travel agent. He lives in Spain, and he sells trips to Europeans who want to go to sunny places, including Cuba. In October, about 80 of his Web sites stopped working, thanks to the US government.
The sites, in English, French and Spanish, had been online since 1998. Some, like www.cuba-hemingway.com, were literary. Others, such as www.cuba-havanacity.com, discussed Cuban history and culture. Still others -- www.bonjourcuba.com and www.ciaocuba.com -- were purely commercial sites aimed at Italian and French tourists.
"I came to work in the morning, and we had no reservations at all," Marshall said on the phone from the Canary Islands. "We thought it was a technical problem."
It turned out, though, that Marshall's Web sites had been put on a US Treasury Department blacklist and, as a consequence, his US domain name registrar, eNom Inc, had disabled them. Marshall said eNom told him it did so after a call from the Treasury Department; the company, based in Bellevue, Washington, says it learned that the sites were on the blacklist through a blog.
Either way, there is no dispute that eNom shut down Marshall's sites without notifying him and has refused to release the domain names to him. In effect, Marshall said, eNom has taken his property and interfered with his business. He has slowly rebuilt his Web business over the last several months, and now many of the same sites operate with the suffix .net rather than .com, through a European registrar. His servers, he said, have been in the Bahamas all along.
Marshall said he did not understand "how Web sites owned by a British national operating via a Spanish travel agency can be affected by US law."
Worse, he said, "these days not even a judge is required for the US government to censor online materials."
A Treasury spokesman, John Rankin, referred a caller to a press release issued in December 2004, almost three years before eNom acted. It said Marshall's company had helped Americans evade restrictions on travel to Cuba and was "a generator of resources that the Cuban regime uses to oppress its people." It added that US companies must not only stop doing business with the company but also freeze its assets, meaning that eNom did exactly what it was legally required to do.
Marshall said he was uninterested in US tourists.
"They can't go anyway," he said.
Peter Fitzgerald, a law professor at Stetson University in Florida who has studied the blacklist -- which the Treasury calls a list of "specially designated nationals" -- said its operation was quite mysterious.
"There really is no explanation or standard," he said, "for why someone gets on the list."
Susan Crawford, a visiting law professor at Yale and a leading authority on Internet law, said the fact that many large domain name registrars are based in the US gives the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, control "over a great deal of speech -- none of which may be actually hosted in the US, about the US or conflicting with any US rights."
"OFAC apparently has the power to order that this speech disappear," Crawford said.
The law under which the Treasury Department is acting has an exemption, known as the Berman Amendment, which seeks to protect "information or informational materials." Marshall's Web sites, though ultimately commercial, would seem to qualify, and it is not clear why they appear on the list. Unlike Americans, who face significant restrictions on travel to Cuba, Europeans are free to go there, and many do. Charles Sims, a lawyer with Proskauer Rose in New York, said the Treasury Department might have gone too far in Marshall's case.
"The US can certainly criminalize the expenditure of money by US citizens in Cuba," Sims said. "But it doesn't properly have any jurisdiction over foreign sites that are not targeted at the US and which are lawful under foreign law."
Rankin said Marshall was free to ask for a review of his case.
"If they want to be taken off the list," Rankin said, "they should contact us to make their case."
That is a problematic system, Fitzgerald said.
"The way to get off the list," he said, "is to go back to the same bureaucrat who put you on."
Last March, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights issued a disturbing report on the OFAC list. Its subtitle: "How a Treasury Department Terrorist Watch List Ensnares Everyday Consumers."
The report, by Shirin Sinnar, said there were 6,400 names on the list and that, like no-fly lists at airports, it gave rise to endless and serious problems of mistaken identity.
"Financial institutions, credit bureaus, charities, car dealerships, health insurers, landlords and employers are now checking names against the list before they open an account, close a sale, rent an apartment or offer a job," it said.
But Marshall's case does not appear to be one of mistaken identity. The government quite specifically intended to interfere with his business.
That, Crawford said, is a scandal.
"The way we communicate these days is through domain names, and the Treasury Department should not be interfering with domain names just as it does not interfere with telecommunications lines," Crawford said.
Curiously, the Treasury has not shut down all of Marshall's .com sites. You can still find, for now, www.cuba-guantanamo.com.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry