Senator John McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee for president, likes to say that he was a "foot soldier" in the Reagan Revolution. So was I, working out of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. But, unlike McCain, a good man and a true American hero, I don't intend to vote Republican this November. I am voting for Senator Barack Obama.
Meritocracy is at the core of US conservative beliefs. So let's face it: George W. Bush has been the worst US president in memory. His administration has been inept, corrupt and without accomplishment. After this performance, why give the Republicans another turn at the helm?
Let's give the other party a chance, even if its policies are not exactly what conservatives may like. In the US, we call it "throwing the bums out."
When meritocracy is downgraded, as it has been during the Bush years, bad things happen. Worst of all, racism has flourished, because productivity and social utility have become less effective in protecting targets of discrimination.
Nowhere is this better illustrated than in the current debate over illegal immigration. It is not so much the illegality of their entrance into the US that riles many conservative Republicans; it's the migrants themselves, especially Hispanics who can't speak English. Never mind that Hispanic migrants are among the hardest-working people in the US.
It is a bitter irony that John McCain, war hero, is considered a traitor by the conservative wing of his party because he has a compassionate attitude toward undocumented immigrants.
Sadly, the Republican Party has been hijacked during the Bush years by sloganeers using code phrases like "illegal immigration" and "protecting the middle class" to mask their racism, and "economic incentive effects" to justify tax policies that are blatantly tilted to the rich.
Responding to this politics of hate, Obama likes to call himself a "hopemonger," not a "hatemonger." It's a great line and it applies.
Hope always sells well in the US. Reagan understood that, and it is one of the reasons he was a great and beloved president, even if some of his policies were flawed. As Senator Hillary Clinton, Obama's rapidly fading rival for the Democratic nomination, is finding out to her dismay, policies can be an overrated commodity in presidential elections that really matter.
The hope that Obama is holding out for Americans is one of reconciliation -- racial, political, between the wealthy and the poor, and between the US and its allies. This is powerful stuff, and dwarfs the narrow technocratic instincts of Clinton, whose schoolgirl approach to the campaign has justly earned her defeat after defeat in the primaries.
Just as former US president Ronald Reagan had his "Reagan Democrats" who were attracted by his message of hope after the malaise of the Jimmy Carter years, Obama will have his "Obama Republicans," attracted by the hope of national reconciliation and healing.
Non-Americans must understand that there is yet another revolution brewing in the US, and that senators Clinton and McCain are both likely to be swept away by it. When conservative Republicans support liberal Democrats (Obama has been rated the most liberal member of the US Senate), "the times they are a-changin'," as Bob Dylan wrote 45 years ago.
Moreover, a crucial difference today is that the generational conflict that so characterized the 1960s -- "Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command," as Bob Dylan put it -- is absent. The young may be taking the lead -- what Obama calls "a revolution from the bottom up" -- but there is little opposition from today's parents.
Indeed, I personally know a successful US hedge fund manager who is quite conservative and consistently votes Republican, but who is thinking of supporting Obama. His daughter dates an African-American and, to his credit, he believes in racial reconciliation. True, an Obama victory would certainly increase his taxes, but some things -- for example, the promise of a multicultural America -- are simply more important.
There appear to be many Republicans and independents who feel the same way. Obama can lose these people, however, if he forgets that he is a reconciler, not a class warrior, and goes from tilting toward the poor to soaking the rich.
In any case, the country's allies should feel relieved by how the presidential election is shaping up. The US needs Obama, but McCain is a reasonable alternative. He is no Bush, and conservative Republican hatred of him is his badge of honor. He would stand up to the haters at home -- including those in his own party -- and to the terrorists abroad. That's a lot better than what we have today.
Melvyn Krauss is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS