While who wins the upcoming presidential election carries a lot of weight for Taiwan's future, what happens with the UN referendums will also affect the nation's path.
If a referendum passes, it will have an enormous impact on Taiwanese foreign relations: China will threaten to implement the "Anti-Secession" Law, flex its military muscles and apply pressure on the US, Japan and the EU to express opposition. If neither referendum passes, the international community might interpret it as a sign that the Taiwanese public has little desire -- or is downright opposed -- to joining or returning to the UN. Consequently, the doors of the UN could be closed for good, bringing a calamity for Taiwan, a scenario of total defeat.
Of course, the best scenario for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would be for the UN bid to pass, and this would allow Taiwan to apply for UN membership under the name by which it is most commonly known.
But if the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) opposition to the referendums remains unchanged, it will likely launch a boycott of both referendums -- and both UN plebiscites could fail. If this happens, Taiwan's worst nightmare will come true.
Another scenario would be if both referendums pass, since it would express the public's hope and determination to join the UN. The question of whether to join as a new member or return to the UN could be determined at a later date.
But as long as one of the referendums passes, regardless of the loss or gain this would represent for the parties as they campaign for the presidential election, the door to the UN would at least be kept open.
Combining the referendums with the presidential election is probably not the cure-all that the DPP seems to believe it is, nor the wild beast imagined by the KMT.
If any party boycotts the referendums, they could suffer the same fate as the 2004 arms purchase referendum and the two referendums held in tandem with the legislative elections last month.
To prevent the referendums from being manipulated by parties for their campaigns, the DPP has decided to support the KMT's referendum to return to the UN, in hopes of preventing the worst case scenario. DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh has even suggested that President Chen Shui-bian (
As president, Chen has the legal authority to suggest a defensive referendum, but the situation is delicate. The political impact from all sides would be great and this is not necessarily a desirable solution.
If the DPP and KMT have the nation's interests in mind, they should encourage voters to vote for both UN referendums. That will neutralize their effect on the election and create a win-win solution. If the KMT refuses to support the DPP referendum, then a solution to minimize damage should be adopted. The parties could come to a consensus and put forward a third choice, a replacement referendum, through the legislature. But time is short and this possibility is waning.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing