I read your article on domestic workers missing holidays ("No holiday for many domestics," Feb. 4, page 2) with anger and shame. I was reminded of the novels of Charles Dickens who described the horrible working conditions in Victorian England, which so shocked the public that new laws were enacted to control greedy, heartless people who employed children in dangerous jobs and offered people a life of endless work and little sleep for paltry wages.
The stories you provided are a shameful litany of Taiwanese greed, exploitation and inhumanity. For your readers who missed the article, you described the case of Mary who had to work from 6am to 11pm daily for NT$500, or less than NT$30 per hour. Talk about slave wages. If she dared to take a day off, she was docked even this pitiful amount. Hired to care for an elderly person, she was also saddled with duties like housework and shopping.
This is not unusual treatment of domestic helpers. Tina was hired to care for a bedridden patient. Her unrelenting work involved turning over a stroke victim and doing a medical check every 90 minutes, so that she was deprived of a decent night's sleep for three years.
Another girl who cared for a sick elderly person for three years received a bonus of NT$300.
What is the reason for such naked exploitation and sickening behavior? The answer is quite simple: These foreign workers are not covered by the Labor Standards Law (
These foreign workers face all kinds of disadvantages. They do the work that Taiwanese citizens find most distasteful, primarily caring for the old, the infirm, the sick and the dying.
These workers face corrupt middlemen from their home countries who extract exorbitant fees for the privilege of working like coolies for pennies. Then they have to deal with the corrupt agents in Taiwan who also greedily take their share of money. Finally, they have to contend with employers who treat them as indentured slaves, denying them decent work conditions, days off, honest wages and even sufficient sleep.
Since these people have invested a great deal for the "privilege" of being exploited in Taiwan, since the conditions in their home countries are often hopeless, since they usually don't speak the language upon arrival and sometimes even have their passports seized by their employers, since they have little legal protection and since they are terrified of being shipped home, they, in great desperation, accept their treatment with a stoicism that is both admirable and pitiful.
Because so many employers treat these people in an inhuman manner, and since there is no legal recourse, there are only a few possible solutions.
The first is to organize a national strike by all foreign domestic employees and caregivers to highlight their plight to the people of Taiwan and to remind their employers that such naked exploitation will not be tolerated. The government would find it difficult and immensely embarrassing to repatriate 160,000 people for being ill-treated. Besides, who would take care of the old and the sick in the meantime?
The other solution is to organize an international boycott by the countries most affected (like the Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand) to stop sending workers for a trial period of three to six months and see if the resulting chaos in Taiwan could finally prod the government into doing the right thing and protecting those who are most vulnerable.
The third and easiest solution is to provide detailed descriptions and names of these unscrupulous employers in newspapers (including the Taipei Times), with pictures when possible, so that public humiliation and shame might keep some of these people from repeating their dismal treatment. This is a dark page in Taiwan's social progress.
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US