The new legislature has reported for work and will face high public expectations. Both major parties have pledged to work for legislative reforms and sunshine legislation, but how much effort they put toward such reforms remains to be seen.
Citizen Congress Watch (
Fifty-three of 81 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators chose not to sign and they were joined by eight of 27 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators. The five legislators that are members of neither the KMT nor the DPP also refused to sign. Despite many new faces in the legislature, outdated ideas still seem to dominate.
Last week, the State Public Prosecutor General's Office under the Supreme Court (
These cases are probably only the tip of the iceberg. The legislative profession is an occupation that offers access to diversified sources of income and high rewards.
Legislators often interact with interest groups in their legislative interpellations, when co-signing bills, making statements or blocking legislative bills. As long as the relationship is based on common ideals, this may not be an issue, but when money is involved -- whether in the form of political donations, campaign donations, activity sponsorships or administrative fees for assistants, offices or transportation -- there is a high risk of corruption.
If we don't regulate lobbying activities and political donations from interest groups, financially disadvantaged groups will find it difficult to make themselves heard. As the system stands, it is difficult to prevent wealthy interest groups from using money to dictate legislation to legislators -- or to block bills. The legislature therefore leans toward the interests of wealthy and influential groups instead of dealing with issues of social justice.
Legislators shouldn't pass the buck if regulations for donations to lawmakers are unclear, as they have intentionally ignored the issue.
Legislation that would clarify acceptable forms of lobbying and its relationship with political donations never makes it to the legislative floor because legislators feel that ambiguity facilitates lobbying. When indicted for corruption, ambiguous legislation is a lawmaker's best friend.
With the number of legislative seats cut by half, individual legislators have more influence over committees and the Cabinet and can exert more pressure on ministries. With new powers come new responsibilities, however. Without moral and behavioral guidelines concerning these new duties, intentional or unintentional violations of the law by legislators will continue.
The legislature's first task should be to eliminate these ambiguities. With clear rules, honest legislators can concentrate on their jobs, knowing where their actions stand legally. Corrupt legislators will also have a hard time getting off the hook.
Party caucuses should put this issue at the top of their list of priorities, and they should push to pass such regulations prior to the presidential election on March 22.
Their actions will help the public decide exactly who is committed to reform and who is merely trying to woo votes with empty promises.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath