It was reported recently that the Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology, the military research arm of the Ministry of Defense, was forced to halt production of advanced cruise missiles because of a lack of key parts not produced domestically.
For two decades, the government has championed technology transfer. From the early 1980s to the late 1990s, Taiwan was a global manufacturing center of many consumer electronics products including personal computers, liquid-crystal-display panels and CD players.
Why is it then, that Taiwan still depends on foreign sources for critical missile parts?
At fault perhaps is a problem known to very few laymen -- false technology transfer.
Take, for example, semiconductor memory production. In the 1980s, companies acquired a complete line of production from abroad and transplanted it to Taiwan.
A typical production line involved using crystal growth chambers, wafer slicing and cutting tools, diffusion furnaces, photolithographic setups, wire-bonding machines, encapsulation equipment and computerized logic testers.
None of those key components were made in Taiwan. What Taiwan provided was simply factories, labor and production management.
Is the situation any better after more than a quarter century in terms of local designs? The answer is no.
The nation's electronics industry still depends on foreign sources for vital ingredients in the production process, including focal plane image sensors, auto-focus motor drives, batteries and power management. Digital camera production is an example of this.
It goes without saying that Taiwanese industries excel in tweaking and improving manufacturing techniques, production efficiency and product yields.
But the nation's companies are lagging in terms of creative design innovation. Behind this problem lies the disadvantages of what is, at times, self-defeating technology transfer.
First of all, the notion that technology can be transferred must be critically challenged and debated.
What actions comprise a "technology transfer?" Procuring and transplanting a production line does not constitute the transfer of technology.
A company that owns such a line can at best be called the operator of a production line -- usually knowing nothing about the inner workings of even a single section of the manufacturing process.
So is it possible to transfer technology? The answer is yes if technology means nothing more than manufacturing. But if technology refers to the design process as well, then the answer is no.
A satellite designed and built from scratch requires thousands of parts and a truck load of engineering blueprints. The complexity of a satellite involves translating the design into a realization in hardware form.
But what a set of electronic blueprints depicts is no more than the final product -- an attempt to juggle design needs with costs and deadlines. It is not documentation of a designer's thought process and does not explain why the designer chose specific solutions or what other options were considered.
That missing information is what spoils the chances of technology transfer.
When it comes to building up a technology base, there are no shortcuts. Technology can be learned only through hard work and sweat.
Taiwan must abandon its belief in quick fixes and tackle its deficiencies in innovation. Otherwise it will often find itself in a situation similar to its difficulties in producing missiles.
Kengchi Goah is a research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council in the US.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS