In your report on the closure of Alexander Health Clubs ("Alexander bosses summoned," Dec. 12, page 2), company chairwoman Candy Tang (唐雅君) attributed the shutdown to a "poorly performing economy, the fallout of credit and cash-card defaults and rising inflation."
From what I saw at Alexander, mismanagement was also likely a part of the problem.
I have been around fitness centers, as a customer and employee, for more than 20 years. I hold two certifications in personal fitness training (NSCA-CPT and ACE). I know a little something about gyms.
Cleanliness was a huge problem. Closing once a month for "major cleaning" was a joke. The facilities appeared no cleaner the day after a "cleaning." In fact, the same dust and debris could be found for weeks and weeks in corners of the fitness areas and on top of the shower stalls.
It seemed more like an excuse to save on payroll expenses. Gyms are germ factories, but Alexander's idea of cleaning the wet areas (showers and spa) appeared to be hosing them down with more water, which did nothing to get rid of the mold and mildew.
A quality gym does major cleaning daily. Custodial staff should be cleaning equipment and facilities throughout the day and night. This may have lost them some members.
It also appeared Alexander relied too heavily on membership dues for their finances. Membership sales revenue is not enough to support a health club. Gyms need to aggressively sell products in their shops, food and beverages in their snack bars and services, such as personal training and spa treatments. While Alexander had all of those things, it never looked like they pushed them much. I rarely saw personal trainers with clients nor did I ever see much effort by the staff to actively promote their services.
Alexander had some valuable assets. They had many convenient locations all over Taipei, which was the deciding factor for me when I chose their club. Their equipment, albeit inconsistent from location to location, was fairly complete and modern.
They had (according to them) more than 100,000 members island-wide. It's inconceivable that the Alexander management couldn't figure out a way to make it work. Instead, a lot of members are out of a lot of money.
Craig Dodge
Xindian
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath