All roads in the "Bali Roadmap" for new climate negotiations lead to one address and one date: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave and Jan. 20, 2009.
That's when a new occupant of the White House will be sworn into office, and when a fresh US team, with what many expect to be a new attitude, will take up the negotiating mandate issued here on Saturday at the end of the two-week UN climate conference.
For seven years, these annual sessions have witnessed a long-running diplomatic feud between the administration of US President George W. Bush, dead set against international obligations for industrial nations to cut greenhouse-gas emissions, and most of the rest of the world, which favors them.
The faceoff played out again here in Bali this past week, when the US delegation blocked an effort to insert into the "roadmap" an ambitious suggested negotiating goal for the next two years -- emissions cuts of 25 to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020.
The "emissions cutters" were spurned again, in a repeat of what has happened consistently since the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which mandated relatively small reductions but was rejected by the US.
Time now may be on the emission cutters' side.
From California to New England, US state governments are enacting their own caps on carbon dioxide and other industrial and transportation gases blamed for global warming. Many US cities have adopted Kyoto-style targets, trimming emissions via "green" building codes, conversion of municipal fleets to hybrid vehicles, energy-saving lighting and other measures.
Judging from recent opinion polls, natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina, the southeastern US drought and the California wildfires apparently are awakening more and Americans to the potential perils of climate change.
"The majority of the United States is with you," California's environment secretary, Linda Adams, told the hundreds of Bali conference delegates last week. "We know that climate change affects all of us."
'A NEW DIRECTION'
In Washington, too, there's movement after years of inaction. A US Senate committee has approved the first legislation mandating caps on greenhouse gases and sent it to the full Senate.
"What you see is a new direction coming," said David Doniger, a veteran climate policy analyst with the Washington-based Natural Resources Defense Council. "And this new direction is a very clear indication of where our policy is going in the future."
That policy will be set primarily by the new president, and the Democratic presidential candidates and at least two of the Republicans -- Senator John McCain and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee -- have endorsed mandatory emissions caps.
To many at Bali, the US election calendar dominates the climate calendar. Even the diplomatically cautious and precise Yvo de Boer, UN climate chief, managed to hint that delegates should bide their time in the coming negotiations next year and in 2009.
"I really hope that that is a discussion" -- about emissions reduction levels -- ``taken up toward the end of that two-year debate," he told reporters.
NOT A SURE THING
But decisive US action, even after Bush, is far from assured.
"The real problem is Congress," New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, climate activist, told a Bali gathering this past week. "They're unwilling to face any issue that has costs or antagonizes any group of voters."
In fact, the emissions-caps bill may face trouble in the full Senate.
Even swift action may come too late for some.
Rising seas, expanding from warmth and from the runoff of melted land ice, are encroaching on low-lying island states, especially in the western Pacific. In these islanders' minds, the roadmaps and new directions were needed a decade or more ago.
"We are very concerned that there is so little progress," Kete Ioane, environment minister of the Cook Islands, told the Bali assembly days ago.
"We are merely asking for our survival, nothing more, nothing less," he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US