I read with interest "Fake shark fins may be infiltrating the Taiwan market" (Nov. 24, page 2).
The supply of shark fins has not reduced "because of attempts to conserve sharks" as there has been no meaningful restrictions placed on any of the commercialized species. It has reduced because the shark is disappearing. Fishing for shark has gone up dramatically -- witness 365 Indonesian boats seized in Australian waters last year, for example -- and spread to even the remotest of places. There are simply fewer sharks available, while the market, especially China, has exploded. It is estimated that fins from 40 million sharks a year are used for soup and in a recent survey 35 percent of urban Chinese reported eating shark fin soup in the last year.
Hydrogen peroxide and other chemicals are used to treat both real and fake fins and consumers should know they are eating chemicals as well as destroying the environment. But perhaps even more serious is the high levels of the toxin methyl mercury found in many shark fins. A recent survey indicates one-third of fins contain levels in excess of WHO recommendations. This is especially dangerous for people who consume a lot of other seafood, which may also contain mercury, and to pregnant women as it may cause developmental problems for the unborn child.
So there is much better advice for potential consumers than "get to know your shark fin." Just say no to shark fin and help protect your health and the world's oceans.
Peter Knights
Executive director, WildAid
San Francisco
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath