Media reports recently told of a credit card salesman who sold credit card application information for thousands of clients to China-based criminal organizations, which then applied for the cards and used them without the victims' knowledge.
Last month and in September, personal information was leaked after notices of fines were posted without envelopes. One hacker also breached Chunghwa Telecom's database and stole personal information.
If such reports have become so frequent, it is easy to imagine how many more are unreported.
Data security poses a serious threat both to financial activities and our lives and property.
The e-mail addresses of almost all staff in my company have been collected and put in a database without our knowledge. This has resulted in the daily reception of hundreds of spam e-mails.
In order to remove spam, the company filters incoming e-mail, but the filters also block several inquiries and communications from important customers.
This causes misunderstandings, as customers sometimes do not receive a prompt response, and affects the operations and trustworthiness of the firm.
My family and friends have almost all been contacted by confidence tricksters.
One acquaintance recently received a visitor who claimed that an inheritance was available and that he required a signature.
I am not sure of the technique used by the conman in question, but the worrying fact is that his organization knew the addresses of the victim's siblings. Each sibling had been approached; imagine what would happen if these thugs were to obtain information on their children's schools.
Breaches of personal data security have allowed these syndicates to obtain all kinds of private information and even kidnap and blackmail victims. A lot of money has been extorted in this way, not to mention the trauma suffered by the victims.
If the Cabinet and the legislature cannot adequately respond to the problem, how can the public feel secure?
The Computer-Processed Personal Data Protection Act (
A glance at the document revealed an anomaly: Data protected under the act is only that which is "computer-processed and stored." That is, manually processed data is excluded.
And aside from government organizations, only credit organizations and seven other professions are regulated by the law. Other professions are not held accountable even if they divulge private information.
More ridiculous is the fact that the legislation states leakers must have had a profit motive to incur liability.
In addition, those collecting personal information are under no obligation to inform the party in question.
From this I understood why data leaks occur with such frequency. The law -- the last line of defense -- cannot guard against breaches in data security. The Cabinet and the legislature are fully responsible for this and must revise the legislation.
Hoover Tai is the president of Hi-Q Biotech International.
Translated by Angela Hong
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs