Taiwan's economy and standard of living have recently become heated electioneering topics. Although the nation's per capita income has increased, it isn't reflected in the standard of living. This is the problem we must look into and resolve, and to confuse one with the other is an election ploy.
First, an M-shaped society is a global phenomenon. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
While the gap between the rich and the poor in China and Hong Kong is wider than in Taiwan, the poverty gap has increased in the US as well.
A good example of this is soaring real estate prices in upscale neighborhoods even though more and more ordinary people cannot even afford to purchase homes. This kind of situation is also appearing in Taipei.
Second, the existence of the poverty gap has to do with resource allocation problems. It is difficult to reform the old unfair allocation system if the opposition is the majority in the legislature. What's more, most Taiwanese businesspeople are in China and do their consuming there.
Even many retired military officers, civil servants and teachers, who enjoy an 18 percent preferential interest rate, consume in China and stimulate the local economy there.
How could older people with lower incomes, low education levels and without special benefits consume enough in Taiwan to stimulate the nation's domestic economy?
Third, the fact that a great amount of domestic capital has flown to China is the most important factor contributing to Taiwan's economic problems. Policies regarding Taiwanese investment in China should be examined and amended on a yearly basis depending on the situation. Politicians cannot just make random promises about these things at liberty.
As Ma encourages Taiwanese businesspeople to go all out and invest in China without caution, the activity has become simply frantic.
Taiwan needs to attract foreign investment by liberalizing economic restrictions in a way that ensures national security.
As Hong Kong's economy and commercial markets have been increasingly Sinicized, Taiwan should make an extra effort to develop its own economy.
In the past the government used big public works and construction projects to tend to Taiwan's domestic needs, develop the economy and create more employment opportunities.
But the opposition majority in the legislature has rejected or postponed annual budgets and some economic proposals. And yet the pan-blues dare to say the government is powerless. They are very good at blaming others for their own wrongdoing.
It is clear that the pan-blue camp is not caring for Taiwan's interests, and it is the Taiwanese public that is harmed the most by the party's scorched-earth politics.
In the process of economic liberalization and globalization, the emergence of disadvantaged groups is unavoidable and the government should do its best to help them.
Taiwan's health insurance system, for example, is doing well in this respect. Proof of how good this system is, is that even Taiwanese who live in China and proclaim their loyalty to that country come back to Taiwan to see a doctor when they get ill.
In any case, there are disadvantaged groups in Taiwan that need to be better cared for by the government.
Returning the KMT's party assets to the public is a feasible way to achieve this. This money can be used for welfare for weaker groups in society.
If Ma Ying-jeou is so concerned about the state of mankind he can offer this donation to help. If he can't, he shouldn't cry crocodile tears.
Paul Lin is a political commentator in Taiwan.
Translated by Ted Yang and Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing