The Cabinet recently announced several measures designed to boost the property sector and speed up urban renewal.
On Nov. 7 it announced that height limits for buildings within a 3km radius of Songshan Airport would be increased from 60m to 90m, affecting nearly 1,200 hectares of land, an industry estimate said.
On Wednesday, it approved a proposal to raise the plot ratio, or floor area ratio, for certain urban renewal projects areas.
Government officials said the new measures -- moves seen as the most positive news for the construction industry in 25 years -- would attract NT$1 trillion (US$31 billion) in domestic investment to 200 urban renewal projects over the next five years.
To show its determination to accelerate urban renewal, the Cabinet also came up with a plan to create a national urban redevelopment agency with a minimum capitalization of NT$5 billion that would fund and encourage urban renewal investments.
Although the Cabinet stressed the relaxation of construction measures was to help beautify the nation's urban landscapes and offer a boost to the property sector, critics saw the announcements as a tactic to benefit the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ahead of legislative and presidential elections.
The DPP government has unveiled property development policies in past election years. The tactics appear to have worked as statistics compiled by Citi Investment Research suggested that property stocks had, on average, gone up 71 percent around election time in 2000 and 2004. On those occasions, the government either announced measures preparing for Chinese capital in the domestic property market or made moves to ease restrictions on cross-strait transportation links.
Investors may again welcome the latest policy announcements and want to increase their bets on the property shares, especially those who own parcels of land near the planned urban renewal areas.
But investors should be cautious about these bullish announcements unless they see real action taken to push the new policies forward. Otherwise, they will only see the surge recede soon after the elections.
Regardless of whether there will be a pre-election property surge this time, investors should be concerned about how the government can make ends meet and how the property market will respond to the new policies.
Industry watchers have already warned of a possible over-supply problem as a result of the new measures. In their opinion, as developers are likely to obtain additional land space at a relatively lower cost because of the relaxed measures, there is likely to be a significant increase in the supply of new houses, particularly in locations where residential space is limited, such as Taipei City or Banciao in Taipei County.
The question is: Will the demand emerge to absorb the new supply? More importantly, where will the demand come from? Will it come from owners who are already suffering from increasingly high prices, or property investors who have become less optimistic about returns?
If the Cabinet truly wants to boost the property market and make our cities more attractive, rather than just playing a political game of smoke and mirrors, it should reinforce public infrastructure in the planned urban renewal areas to attract interest from private developers in the projects.
The Cabinet must prove to the public that its plans are attainable and that it means to implement them.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath