THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Administration's environmental evaluation committee convened its taskforce on the construction of the Suhua Freeway on Thursday to review an analysis of pre- and post-development environmental conditions resubmitted by the Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau.
The report only occasionally refers to the project's possible impact on the local economy and environment, which concerns both non-governmental participants and members of the environmental evaluation committee, who requested the bureau submit documentation to support their findings.
This time around, environmental evaluatizon committee members finally took note of suggestions made by long-ignored Aboriginal groups in Hualien and requested that the bureau follow the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act (原住民族基本法) by establishing how traditional Aboriginal areas along the freeway might be affected.
The bureau report said the freeway will pass through traditional Truku areas in Hoping (和平), Chungte (崇德) and Hsiulin (秀林) villages as well as land reserved for Aborigines. Article 21 of the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act, passed in 2005, stipulates that the government or private individuals engaging in land development, resource usage, ecological preservation or academic research on Aboriginal land should consult with and obtain the approval or participation of Aborigines, who should also share in any profits.
Regrettably, government agencies have again ignored the Truku tribe. Whether or not the Truku tribe approves of the freeway, throughout the whole process the government has ignored their suggestions and has not taken the initiative to establish a platform for discussing the matter.
The government has ignored suggestions and dissenting opinions from Aborigines and given ample proof that when Aboriginal rights collide with national policy, the government acts to gain control over Aboriginal living space. Many basic Aboriginal rights have not been enforced.
The freeway will indeed run through traditional Truku land and thus affect our living environment. The government should follow the Environmental Impact Assessment Act and make a proper evaluation of the impact on local Aboriginal tribes and set up a dialogue with them.
Despite the potential effects of this massive project on Hualien, national and local government officials have failed to organize local public hearings or explanatory meetings.
This reluctance to release project information means that local residents only have a limited understanding of the possible benefits and liabilities for Hualien.
With the government's strong push for the project, dissenting opinions among local residents have been ignored by elected officials and the media.
Many Hualien residents don't oppose a freeway per se, but they do not agree that accept that the freeway under development is the only viable option for developing Hualien without making a careful assessment of the region's actual needs.
The planned project could destroy the Hualien landscape and the government's attitude shows a total lack of respect for the opinions and needs of local residents.
The government must reassess this highly disputed project and listen to the needs of local residents.
The bizarre situation, with national government and local officials doing all they can to persuade the public to blindly accept the project as it is, must not be allowed to continue.
Ciwang Teyra is director of the Information and Publication Division at the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and a member of the Truku tribe.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS