"Stupid" seems to be the latest trendy word in the debate on Taiwan's economy and politics. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) last month to debate the DPP's push to join the UN using the name "Taiwan." Ma responded with former US president Bill Clinton's campaign slogan, "It's the economy, stupid!" President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) immediately attacked Ma, saying, "It's Ma not daring to say Taiwan, stupid!" Ma counterattacked with "Which stupid is it that has messed up Taiwan's economy?" I would like to tell Ma: "It's the blue camp's `go-west' policy, stupid!"
Calling "catch the thief" has always been the pro-China blue camp's best trick. A prime example of this was a recent series of articles in the Chinese-language China Times titled "Taiwan's Hope 2008."
Why has Taiwan's economy lost its luster? The answer lies in the flow of local businesses to China, but the articles accuse the government of isolating itself, blaming the outflow on the DPP for ruling based on political ideology. The authors seem to have forgotten that the phenomenon began under KMT rule, and reached its climax when the advocates of a "one China" market pulled the wool over then-president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) eyes by proposing that Taiwan be turned into an Asia-Pacific operation center as a result of their fascination with the establishment of six major operation centers in Taiwan.
It was this exodus that caused Lee to propose the "no haste, be patient" policy. Today, however, Ma and the pan-blue camp intentionally confuse cause and effect.
It is self-evident that once the production base is relocated to China, ships will no longer stop at our harbors since there is nothing here to transport. However, after traveling across the country for months, Ma still does not understand why the Port of Kaohsiung has dropped from the world's third-largest container port to the sixth-largest. Instead, he proposes curing these ills by opening up direct transportation links to expand cross-strait business links.
It is clear that the industrial relocation to China has hampered Taiwan's industrial competitiveness and internationalization. But the China Times articles actually used "Internationalization is the way out" as its headline -- "internationalization" is pan-blue camp terminology for "sinicization" -- in yet another example of a thief calling "catch the thief."
In terms of the economic downturn discussed in the article series, it is obvious that in addition to globalization, the problem mainly lies in Taiwan's collaboration with China. The outflow has triggered "factor-price equalization" and restricted Taiwanese workers' wages, while unemployment has worsened the poverty problem. The series did not mention this of course. It just criticized the government's various anti-poverty plans.
Amazingly, neither the DPP nor the Presidential Office dare refute the pan-blue camp's accusations or expose their inane logic and deductions by saying, "It's the go-west policy, stupid!" They only list statistics and claim that Taiwan is not inferior to South Korea and avoid the question of the broadening income gap by saying that the situation here is better than that in the US, Thailand, or China.
The government's head-in-the-sand attitude is a result of some DPP heavyweights advocating the go-west policy. Despite their expertise in law and politics, most of their economic knowledge comes from academics and media outlets controlled by the pan-blue camp. Pan-blue camp policy wields a strong influence over their economic decisionmaking, as seen in the "boldly go west," "strengthen Taiwan and go west," "active opening" and "confident opening" policies.
The pro-independence regime's implementation of the pro-unification camp's economic policies is yet another Taiwan miracle. The pan-blue camp's flawed economic discourse has been implemented by a blinkered DPP government, which is now suffering the consequences. What more can we say?
Still, repentance is salvation. Hopefully, the DPP government will stop hesitating and covering up the problem. Admitting one's mistake is the first step to success. The government should also challenge Ma's economic views by telling him and the pan-blue camp, "It's the go west policy, stupid!"
When the truth comes out, the public will surely stand by the pro-localization camp. We have enough wisdom to punch a hole in pro-unification push by pan-blue media outlets and academics.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)