"Stupid" seems to be the latest trendy word in the debate on Taiwan's economy and politics. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) last month to debate the DPP's push to join the UN using the name "Taiwan." Ma responded with former US president Bill Clinton's campaign slogan, "It's the economy, stupid!" President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) immediately attacked Ma, saying, "It's Ma not daring to say Taiwan, stupid!" Ma counterattacked with "Which stupid is it that has messed up Taiwan's economy?" I would like to tell Ma: "It's the blue camp's `go-west' policy, stupid!"
Calling "catch the thief" has always been the pro-China blue camp's best trick. A prime example of this was a recent series of articles in the Chinese-language China Times titled "Taiwan's Hope 2008."
Why has Taiwan's economy lost its luster? The answer lies in the flow of local businesses to China, but the articles accuse the government of isolating itself, blaming the outflow on the DPP for ruling based on political ideology. The authors seem to have forgotten that the phenomenon began under KMT rule, and reached its climax when the advocates of a "one China" market pulled the wool over then-president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) eyes by proposing that Taiwan be turned into an Asia-Pacific operation center as a result of their fascination with the establishment of six major operation centers in Taiwan.
It was this exodus that caused Lee to propose the "no haste, be patient" policy. Today, however, Ma and the pan-blue camp intentionally confuse cause and effect.
It is self-evident that once the production base is relocated to China, ships will no longer stop at our harbors since there is nothing here to transport. However, after traveling across the country for months, Ma still does not understand why the Port of Kaohsiung has dropped from the world's third-largest container port to the sixth-largest. Instead, he proposes curing these ills by opening up direct transportation links to expand cross-strait business links.
It is clear that the industrial relocation to China has hampered Taiwan's industrial competitiveness and internationalization. But the China Times articles actually used "Internationalization is the way out" as its headline -- "internationalization" is pan-blue camp terminology for "sinicization" -- in yet another example of a thief calling "catch the thief."
In terms of the economic downturn discussed in the article series, it is obvious that in addition to globalization, the problem mainly lies in Taiwan's collaboration with China. The outflow has triggered "factor-price equalization" and restricted Taiwanese workers' wages, while unemployment has worsened the poverty problem. The series did not mention this of course. It just criticized the government's various anti-poverty plans.
Amazingly, neither the DPP nor the Presidential Office dare refute the pan-blue camp's accusations or expose their inane logic and deductions by saying, "It's the go-west policy, stupid!" They only list statistics and claim that Taiwan is not inferior to South Korea and avoid the question of the broadening income gap by saying that the situation here is better than that in the US, Thailand, or China.