During the Martial Law era, the Legislative Yuan was an "abnormal" body which, until 1992, was filled with representatives elected to represent all provinces in China -- a situation that exposed it to international ridicule. It resembled more a branch of the Cabinet, rather than an independent institution. It was unable to truly exercise its function of maintaining checks and balances in the government.
However, waves of reforms have gradually transformed the legislature until it became a body worthy of a democracy.
But politics in Taiwan can change direction very fast. In 2000, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took over the government from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After this, the legislature became an even fiercer battleground between the ruling and the opposition parties.
The result is gridlock, with more sensitive proposals, like the draft defense budget and a draft law on retrieving the KMT's ill-gotten wealth, being blocked by the opposition-dominated Procedure Committee.
Even this year's government budget was blocked for half a year before it finally passed.
The appointment of new grand justices also suffered, with the opposition parties adopting a partial boycott by sending only their caucus leaders to vote. The result was that none of the nominations for candidates labeled "deep green" passed.
This was yet another sacrifice made in the continuing battle between the ruling and the opposition parties.
While this model of resistance no doubt satisfies an opposition bent on showing its political power, to the public, it is nothing but a manifestation of the legislature's inability to rationally discuss public issues. Seeing legislators act like a bunch of children, the public has lost its confidence in the legislature.
Media reports say that even after the number of seats in the legislature is halved, the legislative budget will stay the same. This has given rise to public misgivings that when a new legislature takes office, legislators will enjoy even more benefits and twice the power.
One reason why 70 percent of the public supported halving the number of legislative seats when it was first proposed was frustration with the power and prestige of the legislative departments. The public thought that reducing the number of legislators could force the legislative body to listen to public opinion. They never thought that the result of this measure would be the exact opposite.
Hopes that the legislature could turn into a normal, democratically functioning body appear to be dim. Nongovernmental organizations supervising the legislature are hoping that the new legislature will push for more sunshine laws, observe civilized behavior, promote transparency, care for the public and upgrade efficiency. Instead, they are more likely to see legislators continuing to misbehave and ignoring self-discipline in favor of self-enrichment.
Nevertheless, I hope that in the last session of the current legislature, all caucuses and legislators could still learn from the support or opposition they get from the public.
Legislators should establish rules of behavior and learn how to exercise power in a civilized manner. More importantly, they should keep a tight check on the budget. They cannot afford to be lax in controlling the legislature but strict in governing the people.
The long-term effects of holding a double standard will be that the image of the legislature will never improve -- and it will become the greatest mockery of democratic politics.
Ku Chung-hwa is chairman of the Citizen Congress Watch.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS