Another Double Ten national celebration has rolled around, and so it is appropriate to reflect on the circumstances Taiwan finds itself in on this symbolically confusing day.
The unusually aggressive display of military technology planned for today's parade is notable, but the lack of unity between the government and the opposition parties on even fundamental matters such as the need to strengthen the nation's defenses undercuts all the pomp.
We noted last year that beyond the hardware, these nationalist displays have a hollow core and that nationalism is ill-served by symbols and rhetoric that simply serve as face-saving mechanisms for organs of state. Meanwhile, the alternative -- that Taiwan is part of China and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is the natural party to rule all of China -- is so discredited now that even chunks of the KMT cannot bring themselves to spout it in public.
By and large, however, Taiwan is chugging along nicely, with solid economic credentials and growth, even if inflationary pressures are building. Shunting aside media hyperbole, Taiwan remains one of the safest countries in the world, with encouraging standards of education, growing (if erratically distributed) income and a good international reputation in various sectors.
In recent years the picture of Taiwan in the international eye has bounced back and forth between the predatory neuroses of China and the political mandates of competing foreign-affairs factions in the US -- the balance of which has not helped Taiwan to expand its global space.
Politically, the public has grown to more or less accept the ramifications of the executive-legislative gridlock, so much so that the prospect of another four years of this state of affairs seems not to disturb too many people.
Because the next legislative race will almost certainly end in a KMT-controlled floor, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must concentrate its rhetorical and financial resources in retaining the executive. For the DPP, this "gridlock" scenario is something that it will have to accept indefinitely, short of a KMT schism or a revolution in grassroots politics -- a responsibility that the DPP seems unable and unwilling to embrace.
In the meantime, Taiwanese will look on the national day with a degree of skepticism. But it is also true that the things that unite Taiwanese of all backgrounds are growing more numerous, even if they are not always so spectacular. Unified and large-scale displays of nationalism will have to wait.
The more subtle displays of nationalism are encouraging, but intriguingly place excessive stock in expatriates: the travails of baseballer Wang Chien-ming (
This suggests that many Taiwanese feel they and their activities can only be successful and credible as "Taiwanese" if judged against a global standard. We welcome the day when this residue of colonial-era abuse can finally be erased and Taiwanese can derive pride and inspiration from simply being themselves.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing