Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is inconspicuous as a presidential candidate, especially compared with election campaigns in other democracies where, six months prior to polling, the ruling party candidate is always shining as brightly as possible and the sitting president stays out of the limelight.
In Taiwan, strangely, the reverse is true -- a president who must step down is doing all he can to continue shining so brightly that the party's candidate can't be seen. It makes no sense for a lame duck president to set policy that will overlap into the next president's term. I would like to see as much as possible of Hsieh, learn what his views are as an individual and as a leader. The same goes for his running mate, Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), for that matter.
I know Hsieh was admired for his mayoral leadership in Kaohsiung and he wisely avoided questionable circumstances that has led to scandal after scandal for other politicians. And now, an estimated (by Hsieh's own reckoning) 6,000-plus government officials could be indicted over abuse of special funds. Only Hsieh and Su have had the foresight and precision to have left behind records that are 100 percent clean of any false data, which is absolutely amazing. With such an exactness at being an icon of clean government -- why on earth does the Democratic Progressive Party hide him?
Trace Gomez
Sansia, Taipei County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath