Chinese President and General-Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Hu Jintao (
Late last month, the Chinese government pointedly expressed, through pro-Chinese media in Taiwan, its strong opposition to a Taiwan UN referendum. The report said that Hu had emphasized at a meeting of the CCP leadership that waging war against Taiwan was the only task of the Chinese military. He also proposed five phases in the CCP's use of force against Taiwan: preparation for military battle, engagement of military threats, blocking off the Taiwan Strait, all-out attack on Taiwan, and landing on Taiwan.
In the meantime, however, he also addressed six major concerns over the use of force against Taiwan: next year's Beijing Olympics could be affected, coastal business in southeast China could be harmed, China's diplomatic image could be tarnished, introduction of foreign investments could be thwarted, the risk of military casualties and a slowdown of the modernization of China.
Judging from the first part of Hu's speech, the CCP's use of force against Taiwan seems to be pending. But the statement that waging war against Taiwan is the only task of the Chinese military is a huge lie, which is only used to threaten Taiwan and comfort domestic forces. There is no way the CCP would concentrate all its military forces on the Fujian Province front line, ignoring other possible military threats. And the military also needs to cooperate with police to suppress large-scale civil uprisings in the country.
Former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) had already imitated the second phase of military threats against Taiwan, which proved to be ineffectual. Would Hu dare jump directly to the third, fourth or even the fifth phase?
Hu's six major concerns poured cold water on the Chinese military and the "angry youth," or youth displaying a high level of Chinese nationalism. His concern that war could result in huge military sacrifices serves as a direct warning to the generals who are busy making money and enjoying the fruits of a corrupt life.
There are reasons why Hu brought up his concerns. First of all, between 60 percent and 70 percent of Taiwanese consider themselves Taiwanese rather than Chinese. Even with China's opposition, more than half of Taiwanese support Taiwanese independence. It is this cohesion that deters China from invading Taiwan.
Secondly, the US government says it has a responsibility to defend the security of Taiwan.
Thirdly, the top officials in the CCP's political bureau are all civilians. If they launch a war, power will fall into the hands of the military.
Hu still has some problems controlling the armed forces. As a result, a big personnel shuffle in the armed forces was launched in the run-up to the CCP's 17th National Congress next month. The commanders in five of China's seven military regions have been replaced, while many of the generals with practical control over the forces have switched places with generals in charge of military schools in order to prevent them from holding military power for too long.
This, however, doesn't mean that the CCP will not attack Taiwan. If China's bubble economy collapses after next year's Olympics or the 2010 World Expo, the Chinese government could use external war to divert domestic focus. By that time, however, extensive civil uprisings in China might be possible, which could open the door for Taiwan to become a new country.
Paul Lin is a political commentator in Taiwan.
Translated by Ted Yang
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS