At a checkpoint leading on to the airport highway in west Baghdad on Monday, a policeman blocked the traffic. Dressed in a blue checked-uniform, Kevlar helmet, a Kalashnikov slung on his shoulder and a whistle in his hand, the last button of his uniform was missing, exposing a hairy stomach that hung over his military belt.
The sun was setting quickly and the policeman shouted, blew his whistle and pointed his gun at the line of impatient drivers ordering them to stay in line. Something was happening but none of the drivers of the dozens of cars waiting in the early evening heat knew what it was.
About 30 gunmen milled around the checkpoint. Two young men in Iraqi army uniforms sat on the front of an armored personnel carrier. Three men, wearing blue shirts and dark blue trousers stood next to a green SUV. A further dozen gunmen wearing camouflage uniforms, red berets and carrying the insignia on their shoulders of the Ministry of Interior commandos stood in the shade of concrete blast walls that make the checkpoints.
The commandos are accused of being nothing but a Shiite death squad, so when one of them, wearing weight-lifting wristbands, passed between cars looking at faces the drivers' heads sunk into their chests and they looked away. One driver suggested that others join him in driving on a parallel road that passed through west Baghdad neighborhoods, assuring others that the area had become safe.
CHECKPOINTS
"Ami [my uncle] do you want to kill us," one driver said, raising his two hands. "The roads are filled with fake checkpoints killing people on the haweya [ID card]."
"And what do you know about this checkpoint," answered the man and nodded toward the gunmen. "Look at them, they are militiamen."
In that exchange lies the lottery of life in Iraq today. A wrong turn, a wrong checkpoint, a wrong ID card can sometimes be the difference between life and death.
Baghdad was never a beautiful city but as cars whizz through its emptying streets negotiating their way around concrete blocks and checkpoints, the city looks more than ever like a battle zone. But despite those indicators of a city at war, the question many Iraqis have been asking is whether the surge of troops brought in to protect them has made any difference to their lives.
With that in mind the Guardian has spent two days traveling the city, gauging that mood.
In the Yarmouk district, like many areas, wrecks of trucks and cars mingle with collapsed metal and sand barriers by the sides of roads. Some people have improvised their own security plan by placing tree trunks in front of shops to stop suicide bombers parking their cars there.
"Of course, there has been progress," said Ahmad, a taxi driver from Qadissya in west Baghdad. "They [the Americans] are painting murals on the blast walls now."
Concrete walls and checkpoints have divided Baghdad into isolated neighborhoods ostensibly to prevent militia attacks. On the surface they appear to have brought some stability and better security. But in many neighborhoods it has come only through a process of sectarian cleansing -- Shiite driving out Sunni and Sunni driving out Shiite.
DANGEROUS STREETS
In Dora, in the south of Baghdad, Sunni extremists have fought street battles against Shiite militias and have now cleansed the area of its Shiite residents. The US security plan has divided the northern part of the district into fenced neighbourhoods with checkpoints at all the entrances.
"Bodies piled in the street outside my house every morning," said one resident, a shopkeeper, remembering the fighting.
"We live in an isolated area, but at least we have peace. We don't leave our area because once we are on the highway, we have to pass though the commandos' checkpoints and we will be killed," the shopkeeper said.
Another resident, a father-of-three, who lives in the south section of the divided Dora, in the Mechanik district, says gunmen still roam the streets freely.
"I see them in the streets all the time; the American and the Iraqi army don't dare to come into our areas, the gunmen only hide when they see US planes. They drive in cars with no windows so they can attack easily."
"Most of them are fighters from other areas who have settled here. I just saw two gunmen kidnap a man this morning from the highway; it's my morning routine. I have to leave this area, I have to leave but where do I go," the man said.
Another area mentioned as an example of progress is Ameriya, a once secular neighborhood in west Baghdad that had become a base for Sunni al-Qaeda insurgents.
Laith, in his mid-20s, his three brothers and two uncles are working with Ameriya Revolutionaries, a local militia that is cooperating with US forces to drive al-Qaeda gunmen out.
"We can walk in the streets now, we have shops reopening," he said. "All the al-Qaeda fighters have fled into neighboring Khadra'a area."
But just like Dora the sense of security is accompanied by a ghetto arrangement.
"When we wanted to bring trucks to clean the area, we had to bring them from Ramadi [100km away]. Do you think we can bring trucks from Shu'ala [a neighboring Shiite area] of course not, they are Mahdi army," he said.
The frontlines between Jihad, once a Sunni area and now totally Shiite, and Ameriya are sealed with blast-walls but mortars are still falling.
SMALL SATISFACTIONS
"When I leave my area, I have another ID card," Laith said. "Do I dare to come with my own? No."
He paused for a second and then said: "But as long as I can stand in front of my house, that's fine for me."
Mahmoud, who lives in Karrada, now a Shiite neighborhood, said: "The kidnapping is less these days, but the sectarianism is all the same. We are strangers in our own city. Baghdad has been divided; I can't cross to the west, and I can't cross the canal into Sadr City to the east, this bit of Baghdad is my city now."
At the checkpoint on the airport highway the portly policeman was still holding up traffic.
Ahmad chatted with another driver.
"It's too late now; where do we get gasoline from now?" he said.
"For now?" asked the other driver as he leaned on his old, red Toyota.
"No, for tomorrow," Ahmad said.
"Let's live till tomorrow," the driver said, "and then worry about gasoline."
Ghaith Abdul-Ahad won the James Cameron award for foreign reporting earlier this year for his coverage of Iraq.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath