Taipei played host to the first Taiwan-African Heads of State Summit and the Taiwan-Africa Progressive Partnership Forum this year, and will do so again next year. These two important conferences proposed by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) are not only an unprecedented undertaking in Taiwan's diplomatic relations with African countries, but also show that Taiwan has real friendship for Africa, and wants to share its democratic values and help it develop.
Meanwhile, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) keeps insisting that China's overseas development "will not pose any threat to anyone," and Beijing's Foreign Ministry sincerely pledged that "China will never follow the same disastrous road of the Western colonists who bloodily plundered and violated human rights."
However, China has supplied Sudan's dictatorial regime with weapons, and aided the genocide in Darfur for strategic benefits like oil.
In the UN Security Council, China has repeatedly blocked UN peace operations, arguing that it doesn't want to interfere in the internal affairs of another country.
Figures released by the UN High Council for Refugees show that more than 400,000 people had died and more than 3 million had fled their homes in Darfur by last year because UN forces could not come to their aid. China's role as an accomplice in the Darfur humanitarian crisis is now, in the countdown to the Olympics, the issue most often held against Beijing by human rights groups worldwide.
This is not the only time China has aided an African dictator. International sanctions offered an opportunity for the regime of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, to be ousted and replaced by the country's democrats, but China supplied Mugabe with economic aid and political support in a bid to gain access to his country's mineral resources.
Now Mugabe not only has enough money to reorganize his army, but he can continue his genocide even more wantonly, protected by China's veto in the Security Council.
At a time when international copper prices have soared to US$8,000 per tonne, China -- which controls most Zambian copper mines and has a monopoly on the sales -- not only does not pay Zambia according to international convention, but continues to exploit Zambian workers and maintain bad working conditions.
In August last year, several Zambian workers were shot while protesting against low wages. The incident was condemned by international labor groups. China's investments mean "sending raw materials out, bringing cheap manufactured goods in," Zambian Chamber of Commerce president Wilfred Collins Wonani said in an interview with the New York Times.
"This isn't progress. It is colonialism," Wonani said.
Such examples of China's colonialist behavior and of Beijing acting like a supreme ruler are seen in all corners of Africa, from Sudan in the north to Zimbabwe in the south, from Somalia in the west to Niger and Togo in the east.
At the end of last year, trade between China and Africa amounted to more than US$40 billion, and it is estimated that in 2010 it will be more than US$100 billion.
But this view of Africa as nothing more than China's overseas mining district or oil field is a classic example of economic colonialism, where the colonizing country takes out raw materials and sells cheap manufactured goods, depriving Africa of all opportunities for development and escaping poverty.
And to further expand its economic monopoly, the Beijing administration abets the actions of dictatorial regimes, causing the already bad human rights situation in Africa to grow even worse, thus delaying the process of democratization and peace in Africa indefinitely.
In the past five years, China has without a doubt become the new main player in Africa, but Beijing's money-grubbing foreign policy is changing an increasing number of African countries' view of China and making them wonder if it has become a new colonialist power. With its values based in an undemocratic regime, it's not surprising that China is only concerned with raking in as many economic and diplomatic benefits as it can from Africa, and couldn't care less about the deterioration of democracy and human rights. But in the international history of political development, there has never been a country that won long-term allies this way.
The Taiwanese model for managing diplomatic relations is completely different from China's.
It consistently strives to achieve peace, prosperity, equity and justice -- the very founding objectives of the UN.
For many years now, Taiwan has actively promoted freedom, democracy and human rights, which form the mainstream values espoused by the international community.
The successful organizing of the Taiwan-African Heads of State Summit and the Taiwan-Africa Progressive Partnership Forum is not only a model of multi-party cooperation, but also shows that Taiwan earnestly wants to share its democratic values, and takes concrete action with African cooperation in the pursuit of development and happiness.
At this point, we should also give our most sincere support and encouragement to the many diplomats who never abandon their efforts, despite the pressure they face from China.
Chen Chi-mai is deputy secretary-general at the Presidential Office.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath