The French philosopher Jean Baudrillard, you may remember, declared that the Gulf War (the first one) took place only on television. He would not be mystified by today's broadcasting fakes, in which the reality as constituted on TV is the mirror opposite of that experienced by everyone else -- as different as life is from death, in fact. Far from being just an aberration at the BBC, faking is now revealed to be endemic: it's the way TV works.
We should hardly be surprised. Faking it -- hiding one version of reality with another -- is increasingly what management is about; profit is the product of an arbitrage between the company's image of reality and yours. Consider Penelope Cruz's eyelashes, or any number of airbrushed model images. Almost all advertising and much media production is faked in some sense.
We're not talking about honest mistakes here, but the more insidious practice of cutting corners and stretching reality. Articles that don't live up to sensational headlines or stories that are bulked up to justify front-page billing dispel any illusion that the print media are immune to the "embellishing" temptations that broadcasting colleagues have succumbed to.
Many companies practice deception as a part of their business model -- sometimes without even knowing it. In the June issue of Harvard Business Review, Gail McGovern and Youngme Moon describe how companies in a range of industries, from banking and hotels to mobile phones and travel, use a variety of tricks to make you pay more than the service warrants.
EXTRACTING VALUE
All service companies compete in advertising superior customer service. Yet many profit as much by extracting value as creating it. A substantial proportion of retail banking profits, for example, comes from penalizing customers for breaking arbitrary, complicated rules about minimum balances, credit limits and payment deadlines. Mobile phone companies make much of their money out of the minutes we don't use. Hotels and travel operators make it hard to find out about discounts or upgrades; some airlines have computer algorithms that run so often that it is impossible to identify what the "normal" price of a flight ought to be.
Why do companies persist with such pretenses?
First, because they can. In the Photoshop era, any image -- any digital entity -- can be manipulated by the most junior computer user in the company. Which it often is, because, second, there are financial pressures to do so.
Technology and financial pressures have propelled the wave of outsourcing and freelancing, by means of which much of what used to be a company's core work is now performed by contractors and sub-contractors.
This cuts direct costs (although not by as much as managers think), but carries heavy hidden costs. One is that freelancers and outsourcers also work for competitors, reducing differentiation and making it more likely that customers will switch. Another, as the broadcasters have found, is that if the gap between competing realities becomes too large to bridge, cheap is actually dear as trust evaporates and customers turn elsewhere.
VULNERABLE
The BBC, as a public-service broadcaster dependent on a license fee, is particularly vulnerable to charges of trust abuse, and foolhardy for perpetrating it. But the danger for non-publicly supported organizations is just as great. In financial services and mobile phones, churn is so great that a substantial part of company resources is deployed on expensive recruitment of new customers to replace those who leave.
That is called running to stand still. In the case of newspapers, could it be that it is lack of trust that has created such reader keenness to set up their own blogs and Web sites -- that we have created our own competition?
Organizations that want to maintain customer trust have two ways of avoiding broadcasting-style fakes. If they are outsourced, they need robust governance in the shape of explicit rulebooks and contracts (this is one reason why outsourcing turns out to be less cheap than expected -- it needs more formal and visible management, not less).
Old-style unitary companies have better, and often neglected, technology at their disposal. The word "values" has been so overused it is almost meaningless.
But if values are strong and unambiguous enough they are both cheaper and more foolproof than the alternative, since the rules are internalized and organic, rather than external and imposed.
Of course, some companies, pleading the pressure of the capital markets, will claim they have no choice but to fake it. Investors don't care how the numbers are made, only that they are.
This is not so much the Jean Baudrillard as the Groucho Marx school of management. As he put it: "The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made."
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)
RSS