The drubbing Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Liberal Democratic Party received in last Sunday's election in Japan was not only a setback for them, but also meant that an opportunity for leadership in Asia has faded.
A chance to overcome the "demons of history" left from World War II has slipped away. The time to revise Japan's pacifist Constitution has been delayed and Japan's negotiating position has been weakened in talks intended to foil North Korea's nuclear ambitions.
In Tokyo, the prime minister has been severely censured by his voters and now confronts a legislature in which his party controls the lower House of Representatives, while the opposition Democratic Party of Japan controls the upper House of Councilors -- a divided government, it might be said, not unlike that in Washington.
A leading newspaper, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun, referring to Abe and US President George W. Bush, said in a midweek editorial: "Having lost their political momentum, both the Abe and Bush administrations are finding it increasingly difficult to resolve problems."
Abe, having taken office last September with a head of steam inherited from his remarkably successful predecessor Junichiro Koizumi, has experienced repeated breakdowns that led voters to administer a resounding defeat. Three Cabinet ministers resigned before the election over allegations of corruption or controversial statements; a fourth, agriculture minister Norihiko Akagi, resigned this week.
Koizumi had begun to nudge Japan out of the cocoon in which the Japanese had wrapped themselves after World War II. Former deputy minister of foreign affairs Hitoshi Tanaka articulated the aspirations of many Japanese in a paper written before but published after the election, asserting that Japan had the capacity to exert influence far beyond its shores.
To do so, Tanaka argued, "Japan must not only clarify its long-term vision for the region but also develop a clear policy through which to achieve its goals." With a split government and electorate behind him, Abe will find that difficult.
Moreover, the "demons of history" will continue to haunt Abe and Japan, as the politically disrupted nation will be able to do little to conquer them. The US House of Representatives, for instance, passed a non-binding resolution this week calling on Japan to apologize for recruiting hundreds of women into prostitution to serve as "comfort women" for soldiers during World War II.
The voice vote, meaning no record was made, was taken despite opposition from Senator Daniel Inouyei, who said that six Japanese prime ministers had apologized since 1994. The senator, a Japanese American who rarely comments on Japan, questioned the propriety of the US condemning another nation when the US was not involved.
"How would the US government have reacted if the legislature of some other nation had condemned our historical actions in World War II?" the senator asked, referring to the incarceration of 120,000 Japanese Americans during that war.
He warned, as did prominent Japanese, that the resolution would harm US relations with Japan.
Abe will have difficulty in pushing through a revision of Article IX of the Constitution that constrains Japan's armed forces and legislation that would permit them to operate in collective defense with other nations, notably the US. The US has been quietly urging those changes.
Senior US military officers said, however, that they expected the realignment of US forces in Japan, such as consolidating bases and locating Japanese headquarters alongside US headquarters, to continue.
Said one officer: "The US and Japan signed government-to-government agreements, which make this a done deal, so to speak."
The officers said that North Korea, which is building missiles and nuclear weapons, and China, which has been rapidly expanding its forces, are still perceived to threaten Japan's security.
Referring to North Korea, an officer said: "The continuing sense of Japan's vulnerability in light of last year's nuke test and missile launches will likely keep the initiatives going."
The debate within Japan about acquiring nuclear weapons that has been generated by the perceived threats from North Korea and China will most likely continue. With a divided government, however, those who might advocate that their nation acquire nuclear arms would come up against even more obstacles than exist now in nuclear-allergic Japan.
As ever, the key to a nuclear Japan is held in Washington, not Tokyo. So long has the Japanese believe the US will keep its commitments to defend Japan with nuclear weapons, if necessary, they will refrain from acquiring their own.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath