When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) went to Taichung County to visit towel producers last Tuesday, he discussed the idea of tightening testing standards to limit imports of Chinese towels, much as Japan once raised its vehicle emission standards to control US imports. Imports would be limited because some Chinese towels would not pass the test.
Ma also said, however, that the KMT was in favor of a "cross-strait common market" as part of the nation's economic strategy.
This would be taking a customs union one step further, with goods, labor, capital and services flowing freely between the two member states. Towels would be one of those goods flowing back and forth, with no restrictions.
Ma's proposal of raising testing standards is a form of trade protectionism mostly employed by developed nations. It is completely at odds with his proposal to liberalize trade and facilitate the flow of goods through a common market.
So what we have now is Ma contradicting himself. After calling for a "cross-strait common market" that would allow Chinese towels to be imported freely, he now wants the government to prevent Chinese towels from being dumped on the local market.
This flip-flopping economic policy reveals two possibilities: First, his talk of preventing the dumping of Chinese towels is a short-term political move; Second, when his camp proposed a "cross-strait common market," it had not thoroughly considered the needs of Taiwan's economic development and was rashly proposed.
Since the common market proposal was made, Ma's camp has had to go back and amend its ideas over and over again. For example, it says it wants restrictions on Chinese labor working in Taiwan. And now Ma's talk about opposing Chinese towel dumping has once more highlighted the contradictions in the economic strategy he advocates.
If Ma doesn't agree to let Chinese labor come to Taiwan unrestricted and doesn't agree to let Chinese towels be dumped in Taiwan, then perhaps we should request that he simply rescind his support for the establishment of a "cross-strait common market."
Ma should reconsider the logic and consistency of his economic strategy from the perspective of the nation's economic development.
Lu Jiun-wei is a doctoral student at National Taiwan University's department of political science.
Translated by Marc Langer
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95