While the US is over-stretched in Iraq and increasingly mired in domestic politics, China is systematically modernizing and expanding its military capability. Its defense budget has seen double-digit annual increases in recent years. It is working to develop anti-satellite missile capability, as well as a nuclear submarine fleet equipped with long-range nuclear missiles.
The images of China's new Jin-class nuclear-powered submarine have appeared on an Internet Web site. Reporting on this, Eric Rosenberg, of Hearst Newspapers, wrote: "The Jin-class submarine would be a big step forward for Beijing. It would allow China, which relies on land-based nuclear missiles as a nuclear deterrent, to broaden its arsenal to include a submarine fleet that is much harder for an enemy to locate and destroy."
Its development is proceeding fast, with the Pentagon reportedly saying the submarine and missile system could be ready for regular patrols before 2010.
This has consequences not only for the US but for the region. China might not yet be ready to directly challenge US military supremacy, but its military capability will increasingly make it difficult for the US to confront it without serious costs. In short, China's power is likely to progressively neutralize US military power.
Take Taiwan, for instance. China has hundreds of missiles targeted at Taiwan. This not only provocative for Taiwan, but also for the US, which is committed to defending Taiwan.
But the US gives the impression of being a helpless giant, cautioning Taipei against upsetting the "status quo" for fear of inviting Chinese military retaliation.
In other words, China has developed a veto of sorts on Taiwan's sovereignty. And with its military capability expanding steadily, one shudders to think what China might get away with.
Beijing wants to turn the Taiwan Strait into its "inland lake," where it will have the power to exercise total control if and when needed. With the development and deployment of its nuclear submarine arm in the next few years, it hopes to exercise that power against any US intervention to help out Taiwan. Will the US still be able to move its naval fleet as it did in the mid-1990s when Taiwan seemed under imminent Chinese attack?
North Korea is another example of where the US is progressively becoming a hostage to China's growing political and military clout. At the political level, China is subtly leading the US into a deal on the nuclear issue that North Korea had more or less accepted in the 1990s. This includes political and economic concessions, such as releasing North Korean funds frozen in a Macau bank and delivery of oil supplies, on the part of the US. China will thus continue to have a determining role in how the entire cycle of US nonproliferation efforts with Pyongyang proceeds -- if they ever succeed.
At the same time the US will always be constrained in its military response to North Korea's on-off intransigence for fear of Beijing's involvement, especially now that China is steadily expanding its military power.
In the Asia-Pacific region, China is increasingly seen with a mixture of awe and admiration. Its rapid economic growth, its sheer size in economic and political terms and its growing military power appear to be overwhelming.
With much of world news concentrated on the perceived US debacle in Iraq and a sense of its declining power, China increasingly appears to be the new rising superpower. It is no wonder then that more and more countries in the region are accommodating themselves to this new "reality," while ignoring China's enormous social, economic and political problems and contradictions that make it very fragile.
Australia is an important example in this regard, especially as it is a staunch US ally in the region. Even as Canberra goes about further cementing its security ties with the US and Japan, it also feels the need to explain and underplay this development in dealing with China.
During his recent visit to China, Australian Defense Minister Brendan Nelson assured his hosts that Canberra didn't see any threat from Beijing's increased military profile, even though Australia's recent defense update pointed to China's growing military capability as a likely cause of regional instability.
On the question of Australia's support for a US-Japan anti-missile defense system, he emphasized that it was directed at "rogue states" and not at China.
As for the induction of India into the US-Australia-Japan security dialogue, Nelson said that the "so-called quadrilateral strategic dialogue with India was not something we are pursuing."
That was about the same time he was headed toward the Indian capital to promote "warmer relations" with New Delhi.
Nelson was at also pains to assure his Chinese hosts that Australia's strengthening security ties with Japan were not intended to "contain China's rise."
If a staunch US ally like Australia feels the need to accommodate China through verbal acrobatics, it just goes to show how much Beijing has traveled on the way to regional primacy.
And if Canberra is in this situation, it is no wonder that other countries in the region are bowing to what they see as China's inevitable supremacy.
A major reason for this is that the US is mired elsewhere, leaving the field to China and enabling it to even appear benign compared to perceived US military and political intervention elsewhere.
The US needs to reorient its military policies lest China end up filling the gap by default -- as is happening in the Asia-Pacific.
Sushil Seth is a writer based in Australia.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under