The Maokong Cable Car system opened last Wednesday. What should have been a good thing has become a mess. The current and former mayor of Taipei were left hanging in mid-air on opening day. On the ground, long lines of people formed, traffic was a mess and street vendors jacked up their prices.
The mayor has reportedly decided that a set of management rules are needed -- and will be issued in October. City residents can appreciate the pressures on public officials, but having seen such chaos and inefficiency, I can only shake my head. Government institutions must make an effort to improve their project implementation and management skills.
Many construction projects in Taiwan focus only on the construction itself. The quality of construction is important. But as we see with the Maokong project, simply finishing a project doesn't ensure smooth operations.
It seems the focus on the cable car project was only on the hardware, while factors affecting the use of the facilities were ignored.
What impact would weather and high temperatures have? What would be the impact of traffic? Would traffic controls be needed? What about street vendors? Would they need to be controlled?
Questions such as these should have been dealt with beforehand. But such details are frequently overlooked, which results in expensive construction projects becoming the target of criticism, and this is a pity.
This is directly related to government agencies ignorance of management. Manageability is ignored at high social cost. In light of this, it is not strange that the inefficiency of government agencies is one of the main reasons that Taiwan frequently ranks so low in international competitiveness rankings.
The chaos surrounding the opening of the Maokong Cable Car system once again tells us that construction planning must include detailed and exhaustive management planning. If this is delayed until after the facility opens, chaos will be a given.
If Taiwan wants to overcome bottlenecks created by government inefficiency, we must strengthen management training and administrative ability within the civil service. If we don't, any talk about developing the tourism industry or improving competitiveness will remain ink on paper.
Ko Cheng-en is a professor in the College of Management at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers