Globalization has reduced the bargaining power of unskilled workers and pushed up inequality in many Western countries, the OECD said this week, urging governments to improve their social safety nets.
The Paris-based rich nations club said in its annual Employment Outlook that the prospect of offshoring was likely to have increased the vulnerability of jobs and wages in developed countries.
The report stressed that though more open trade and investment policies had a powerful upward effect on living standards around the world, "some workers may lose from globalization." It says these were usually those working in industries in Western countries that decline as a result of competition from cheap imports.
"Millions are benefiting from globalization but at the same time there's a feeling something's wrong with the process," OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria said.
Governments needed to address public concern over jobs and pay in a world being transformed at unprecedented speed by technology, cheap transport and communications, and the rise of China, Russia, India and Brazil with vast pools of cheap labor, he added.
Those four countries account for 45 percent of the world labor supply today, compared to 19 percent for the OECD countries, which include the US, Japan and much of Europe.
The report pointed to a "remarkable" fall in the share of wages of national income in OECD member countries in the past couple of decades. Japanese wages have fallen by around a quarter as a share of GDP in the past 30 years, while they have dropped 13 percent in the 15 wealthier EU countries and 7 percent in the US, the report showed. US wages as a share of GDP remain ahead of those in the EU.
The report also showed rising wage inequality in most OECD members over the past decade with the notable exceptions of Spain and Ireland.
In Britain, the gap between rich and poor remained virtually unchanged, although its level was one of the higher ones. The figures run only to 2005, though, since when inequality in the UK has increased on the government's own measures.
Some of the biggest increases in the OECD were in Poland, Hungary and South Korea. Inequality widened only slightly over the past decade in the US but is at the upper end of the scale.
The US also saw the biggest increase in the wealth of those at the very top of the income scale, along with Canada. Increases in Britain, Japan and France were more subdued, the report showed.
Offshoring, where companies reallocate production or services to cheaper places, was not as big a job-killer in OECD countries as believed, said Gurria.
And offshoring is not the preserve of "Anglo-Saxon" economies such as the UK and US. Indeed, the US remains one of the smallest offshorers in the OECD whereas countries such as Sweden, Norway, Belgium and the Netherlands are among the biggest.
The OECD urged governments to resist protectionist responses and instead adapt employment policies to help people move from one job to another with greater ease and sense of security. It singled out Denmark and Austria as having good policies to help workers adapt to change.
Gurria said some people had lost out, but this was something policies should tackle because globalization was a positive and inevitable process.
"It's how you make the best out of it," he said.
"The job for life is dead," OECD labor market expert Raymond Torres said. "In order to reap the benefits of globalization you have to move. Enterprises have to move into new areas, new niches, and people have to move into new enterprises. The thing now is to protect people, but not protect jobs, because some jobs have no future."
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas