Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential nominee Ma Ying-jeou (
If Ma had taken any other course, he would have had to pay the price in next year's presidential election for the foolish actions of pan-blue legislators.
The KMT finally appears to understand the obligations that political parties and legislators have and is now willing to first examine the budget bill instead of linking it to passage of the commission bill.
The budget bill affects every national construction project, and is important to taxpayers' wallets. Therefore, examining the budget bill is one of the most critical functions of a legislature. The commission bill, in contrast, deals with whether the rules of the political game are fair.
For more than six months the pan-blue camp has mistakenly tried to link the two. Recognizing this error was long overdue.
According to Article 51 of the Budget Act (
The KMT thought it was clever to use its legislative majority to hold the budget plan hostage to force the legislature to review the commission bill. The Democratic Progressive Party, however, is also guilty of paralyzing the legislature to prevent a review of the bill.
If the legislative deadlock is not resolved before the end of this legislative session on Friday -- and if no extraordinary session is held to pass the bill -- then next fall lawmakers will be faced with having to review and pass both the 2007 budget and the 2008 budget. This would put both the government and the legislature in an untenable situation.
The 2007 budget bill has been stuck in the legislature for more than 190 days, delaying national infrastructure projects and tarnishing the national image. It is time to end the farce. The opposition should unconditionally review and pass the budget bill.
There are no winners or losers here. The longer the deadlock, the greater the losses on all sides. The deadlock has resulted in increasing public criticism, and the opposition camp must take the majority of the blame for this. Ma should not be seeking to claim credit for resolving a situation that he previously said he had no control over.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS