In the spring of 1989, giant crowds marched through the streets of China's cities, demanding an end to official corruption and more political freedom.
Inspired by the spectacle of these dramatic demonstrations, foreign observers predicted that the days of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP) were numbered.
And yet, as we prepare to mark the 18th anniversary of the brutal June 4 Tiananmen Square massacre, which put an end to the student-led protests, the party remains in power.
The CCP's own actions have helped it stay in control. By unexpectedly allowing entrepreneurs into its ranks, it has co-opted a potentially threatening group. It has pulled back from micromanaging many aspects of private life, a cause of much discontent in the 1980s.
But the party has also had some lucky breaks in the international arena and been helped by unexpected post-1989 developments in the rest of the world.
In the early 1990s, Russia's decline and Yugoslavia's free-fall into chaos benefited the CCP. These phenomena allowed the party to say to the Chinese people, "You may be sick of Communism, but there seems to be something worse out there -- post-Communism."
Closer to home, the crisis sparked by North Korea's nuclear ambitions has also helped the party led by the notoriously erratic Kim Jong-il. North Korea is isolated from most other countries, but has long had close ties to China.
Whenever Kim behaves outrageously, the US, Russia, Japan and South Korea appeal to the CCP for help, treating Beijing as the world's best hope for keeping Pyongyang in check.
This allows the party to say to the Chinese people that it has been successful in raising China's status in the realm of global diplomacy.
The general instability of 21st-century geopolitics has also bolstered the party. One argument the party uses to convince the Chinese people that it should remain in control is that, in times of global unrest, states without strong, stable governments become vulnerable to bullying or even invasion.
How much longer can the party defy the predictions of its imminent demise that were so common in 1989?
This question is impossible to answer with certainty, but recent history tells us one thing:
The party's fate will continue to depend not just on what happens inside China, but also what happens in the unpredictable world that lies beyond its borders.
Jeffrey Wasserstrom is a professor of history at the University of California, Irvine, and a writer for the History News Service.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS