I've just signed the "Say NO to United Nations' abolishment of Traditional Chinese in 2008" petition. Based on the description provided on the petition's Web site, the rationale behind supporting simplified Chinese is to increase the Chinese literacy rate throughout the world.
Now, I know the literacy rate in the People's Republic of China (PRC) is lacking. While meeting Chinese refugees arriving in Canada, I noticed that most of them did not speak or write Mandarin. That could have been a skewed sample.
However, if decades of using simplified Chinese yielded a literacy rate of 95.1 percent for men and 86.5 percent for women, we would be fools to buy the argument that simplified Chinese will produce a higher literacy rate in or outside of China given that Taiwan's literacy rate is 96.1 percent, according to the CIA's World Factbook.
The argument itself -- to make the writing simple so more people can learn it -- is like saying let's use "U" for university and "A" for apple so we can bring up English literacy rates throughout the world.
The Chinese language in itself is a difficult language. It is complicated because there is no connection between how a character sounds and how it is written -- whether it be in simplified or traditional form. To learn Chinese takes much time, effort, and unfortunately, aptitude -- not all that different from any other languages.
This calls into question the reason behind this attempt by the UN to "unify" the Chinese language. Did it try to "unify" French? Well, why not?
The UN is supposed to be a place of diversity and integration, but I am not quite sure it lives up to its name or its mission. Since when is the UN in a position to unify any language? It was entrusted with looking after world peace and look what it has done.
I think it has confused world peace with world unification. In case I am mistaken and the UN really has the authority to meddle with languages -- with a liberal degree disrespect of those languages' host cultures -- then perhaps it is a good time to work on the languages of the Middle East. Communications in that region have not been working well lately.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented