Is that a real Coach Handbag? Is that medicine I need for my blood pressure real? I hope so.
If I write a song or a book, will I be properly compensated for it? Will my children be able work in jobs that reward them for their creativity and hard work?
Unfortunately, some people believe that protecting intellectual property rights (IPR) only means that they have to pay for a product they would prefer to get for free or for next to nothing.
Most consider intellectual property as extending to music, movies, or books. But they also cover handbags, designer clothing and more scarily, medicines.
Of course it's true: We should pay for what we use. But it is important to understand that protecting intellectual property is really about protecting all of us.
Patents, copyrights and trademarks are there for two reasons. The first is to let the consumer know what he or she is buying, whether it is a designer handbag, a piece of expensive electronic equipment, or life-saving medicine.
The second reason is to protect the legitimate rights of the producer of products.
Yes, the author should be paid for his work, the inventor for her discovery and the designer for his creativity.
That, in turn, helps to foster innovation. And innovation is what drives our economies, raises our standard of living and improves our health care.
If you don't believe me, look at the statistics: The World Economic Forum reported that the 20 countries perceived to have the strongest intellectual property protection were among the world's top 27 countries in terms of economic growth opportunities.
In contrast, the countries with the worst intellectual property protection were at the bottom of the pile among the bottom 36 countries. It makes sense.
Most of the growth of the global economy in the last century -- a 20-fold increase -- was due to innovation. Now that 70 percent of global output is generated by services, innovation has become even more important.
Both the US and Taiwan have a strong interest in protecting and fostering our innovators.
For Taiwan, in particular, the future is clear with respect to economic development. The nation's high-tech industries, scientists and engineers -- of which you are justifiably proud -- will lead to economic growth and development. Encouraging and protecting their discoveries and innovations are key to a prosperous future.
Copyright protections for Taiwan's musicians, writers and artists -- whether they be world famous or local favorites -- are important to keep them creating and contributing to Taiwan's rich culture.
And yes, when we take medicine, whether it be for a headache, high blood pressure, or even the flu, we all deserve to know what exactly we are buying.
Taiwan is taking steps to improve its intellectual property protection. The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office under the Ministry of Economic Affairs, along with many others in government, industry and education, are working hard on this important issue. Not only are they improving protections for all of us, they are helping to build a prosperous future for the nation.
Best wishes to everyone on World Intellectual Property Day.
Stephen Young is the director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS