Is that a real Coach Handbag? Is that medicine I need for my blood pressure real? I hope so.
If I write a song or a book, will I be properly compensated for it? Will my children be able work in jobs that reward them for their creativity and hard work?
Unfortunately, some people believe that protecting intellectual property rights (IPR) only means that they have to pay for a product they would prefer to get for free or for next to nothing.
Most consider intellectual property as extending to music, movies, or books. But they also cover handbags, designer clothing and more scarily, medicines.
Of course it's true: We should pay for what we use. But it is important to understand that protecting intellectual property is really about protecting all of us.
Patents, copyrights and trademarks are there for two reasons. The first is to let the consumer know what he or she is buying, whether it is a designer handbag, a piece of expensive electronic equipment, or life-saving medicine.
The second reason is to protect the legitimate rights of the producer of products.
Yes, the author should be paid for his work, the inventor for her discovery and the designer for his creativity.
That, in turn, helps to foster innovation. And innovation is what drives our economies, raises our standard of living and improves our health care.
If you don't believe me, look at the statistics: The World Economic Forum reported that the 20 countries perceived to have the strongest intellectual property protection were among the world's top 27 countries in terms of economic growth opportunities.
In contrast, the countries with the worst intellectual property protection were at the bottom of the pile among the bottom 36 countries. It makes sense.
Most of the growth of the global economy in the last century -- a 20-fold increase -- was due to innovation. Now that 70 percent of global output is generated by services, innovation has become even more important.
Both the US and Taiwan have a strong interest in protecting and fostering our innovators.
For Taiwan, in particular, the future is clear with respect to economic development. The nation's high-tech industries, scientists and engineers -- of which you are justifiably proud -- will lead to economic growth and development. Encouraging and protecting their discoveries and innovations are key to a prosperous future.
Copyright protections for Taiwan's musicians, writers and artists -- whether they be world famous or local favorites -- are important to keep them creating and contributing to Taiwan's rich culture.
And yes, when we take medicine, whether it be for a headache, high blood pressure, or even the flu, we all deserve to know what exactly we are buying.
Taiwan is taking steps to improve its intellectual property protection. The Taiwan Intellectual Property Office under the Ministry of Economic Affairs, along with many others in government, industry and education, are working hard on this important issue. Not only are they improving protections for all of us, they are helping to build a prosperous future for the nation.
Best wishes to everyone on World Intellectual Property Day.
Stephen Young is the director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS