The broadcast of a video of a gangster delivering a death threat taken by TVBS Nantou reporter Shih Chen-kang (史鎮康) has caused quite a stir. TVBS committed at least five major journalistic errors in this incident.
First, TVBS should not have broadcast footage of a gangster delivering threats. Its management stressed that it was not aware that the video had been filmed by one of its reporters. But shouldn't have aired the video even if it had been sent in by the gangster himself, because a media outlet should not be used as a tool for intimidating the public.
US media outlets also compete for exclusives, but they will not broadcast threatening videos sent by terrorists. Al-Jazeera's frequent broadcasts of videos of terrorists beheading their hostages drew the ire of the entire US media, who refused to become mouthpieces for terrorists.
The fundamental problem is not that TVBS was not aware of where the video came from, but rather its lack of understanding that the media has a responsibility toward the public.
Second, the station lacks a fundamental ability to determine what is newsworthy. None of its managers questioned how a gangster could produce such a professional video. Nor did the general manager Lee Tao (李濤), raise any questions after the footage was aired -- proof again that the station lacks fundamental news evaluation skills.
Third, TVBS's training of its reporters is ineffectual, and consequently they have no journalistic ethics. When the uproar over the video erupted, Shih complained that it was his superiors who had decided to broadcast the video so he shouldn't have to bear full responsibility. However, Shih concealed the fact that he had shot the video.
Fourth, TVBS does not compete for exclusives, but is rather a mouthpiece for the deep blues. The station tried to dismiss the incident as the result of a reporter trying to get an exclusive. However, this was a scandal waiting to happen given the station's strong pan-blue ideology.
The scandal over New York Times reporter Jayson Blair's plagiarism and fabrication of stories a few years ago was directly related to the longstanding ideological connivance of the paper's then editor-in-chief.
Former CBS news anchor Dan Rather also had to apologize for relying on allegedly bogus documents for a report on US President George W. Bush's National Guard service.
TVBS has always taken a deep-blue point of view and rejoices in gloating over Taiwan's misfortunes. By broadcasting the gangster footage, the station could highlight the deteriorating public security situation and the impotence of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
In his talk show, Lee allows deeply inflammatory statements against the DPP to slip by. Small wonder that in an environment where ideology overrides every other concern, journalists dance to the same deep-blue tune and fabricate news.
Fifth, TVBS does not take responsibility for its mistakes. If a similar scandal happened to a Western media outlet, the editor-in-chief would resign immediately. Faced with widespread criticism, Lee eventually resigned as general manager of TVBS. The fact that Lee concurrently was general manager and host of a political talk show meant that the station's impartiality and objectivity was compromised early on, and the talk show had a clear political point of view.
To please their supervisors and keep their jobs, TVBS reporters and journalists alike dare not voice differing opinions on the handling of news. The fact that Lee and his wife Lee Yen-chiou (李艷秋) each hosts a political talk show on the station that they ran together turned the station into a "mom-and-pop" station and directly challenged its basic integrity.
Cao Changqing is a political commentator based in the US.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath