I read with some dismay about Taipei's plans to fine bicyclists who fail to adhere to traffic laws.
The report cited an increasing number of bicycle-related injuries annually as the motivation for this crackdown on cyclists, with last year's number of such accidents totalling 885. What concerns me is that it appears cyclists are being singled out as the sole cause of such accidents and thus solely deserving of reprimand.
I recently acquired an excellent bicycle from Giant of Taiwan, and have been riding extensively around Taipei while working on music projects here. In all my experiences cycling in countries such as the US, Canada, Germany, Austria and Italy, I have never experienced cycling like here in Taipei. From my observations, the greatest risk to cyclists are taxi drivers -- who seem to believe they are the masters of the roadway -- and city buses seemingly anxious to stay on schedule.
I have been repeatedly cut off by both and no measure of safe distancing seems to prevent this danger.
I have also noticed a glaring absence of planning and infrastructure for bicycles in Taipei. I do recognize and applaud the work Taipei has done for creating bicycle paths along the rivers and I have biked from Taipei to Danshui on many occasions. But within Taipei itself, there are no bicycle lanes that I have seen and cyclists are simply left to do battle with the traffic at large.
Leaving cyclists to fend for themselves on Taipei's aggressive roadways will undoubtedly result in the cyclist losing that competition again and again; hence the soaring accident rate. Perhaps it would be more suitable to consider how to better accommodate cyclists in Taipei.
I commend Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin's (
However, if Hau truly wishes to support and promote cycling in Taipei -- which in turn contributes to improving the air quality in one of Taiwan's smoggiest cities -- I hope he will do more than simply restrict fines to the most errant of bicyclists. I encourage him to thoroughly review Taipei's roadways from a bicycling perspective, consult with cities in foreign countries and bring real improvement to this city's traffic system.
I also invite him to get on his bicycle and give me a call. I'll be happy to ride with him through the "wild west" of Taipei's busier streets in an effort to give him some first-hand experience of what combat-cycling in Taipei is like.
Matthew Lien
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath