An article on the indictment of a former Bureau of Immigration (BOI) clerk for assisting a human trafficking ring in bringing Chinese women into Taiwan to work as prostitutes ("Ex-BOI clerk indicted for role in prostitution ring," March 1, page 4) reveals a regrettable lack of understanding of the true nature of these "snakehead" operations.
The article -- and apparently the indictment -- state that the women in question "tended to pose as brides of Taiwanese men before turning to prostitution." The use of the phrase "turning to prostitution" implies it was a choice the women made of their own free will.
The reality of human trafficking is that women are often victims of deception. Lured with promises of high-paying jobs, upon arrival to a new country these women discover that they will be held in debt bondage and forced to work in brothels for no pay until their debts are cleared. Their travel documents are seized and they are kept in check with threats of physical violence against themselves and their families. That is the face of modern slavery and not quite the kind of life someone "turns to."
Your article states that the clerk colluded with the trafficking ring to smuggle in "Chinese prostitutes." Were they prostitutes before they arrived in Taiwan, or were they forced into the trade afterwards?
This is the question that should be asked by both the CNA staffer who so easily labeled the women "Chinese prostitutes" and the prosecutor who charged them with crimes when in fact they may be victims.
The misperception of the true circumstances of women like these is one of the many tools that human traffickers rely on to stay in business.
Kenneth Zydek
Boston, Massachusetts
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath