Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) recently toured Africa, seeking to secure dependable sources of natural resources, but also to promote China's "peaceful rise." Such tours are designed to give notice that China is emerging on the world stage, as well as to make it look respectable as a major world power. But China's quest for international respect is not well served by its embrace of rogue nations like Sudan, Venezuela and Myanmar, much less by its secretive military build-up and its recent adventure in outer space.
Indeed, when the Chinese military secretly and recklessly fired a land-based missile into outer space in mid-January and shattered one of China's aging satellites, the government caused outrage from London to Tokyo to Washington. After several days of silence in the face of incontrovertible evidence of the launch, China's leaders reluctantly admitted what China had done, but claimed that the "test was not directed at any country and does not constitute a threat to any country."
Such denials are becoming unconvincing. In fact, this dangerous and irresponsible action is yet another key sign that China's rise as a global power lacks any guarantee that it will be a peaceful nation once it grows strong. It flatly contradicts the repeated assurances of China's leaders that China's rise will bring only "harmony" and peace to the international community.
Lurking behind China's ambition in space is the spirit of the Cold War, which continues to permeate the inner circles of the military high command, whose adversary is unmistakably the US. With the collapse of the Soviet communist regime, the US continues to enjoy a dominant role in space exploration for peaceful and scientific development. But since the 1980s, the US has been ambivalent about the ultimate military and civilian utility of its space efforts.
This ambivalence has now been greatly reduced because of China's recent action, which could precipitate a race to militarize and weaponize outer space. Should this happen, China would share a large part of the blame.
China's adventurism and its blithe assumption that it can deal with any international dictator it wishes and disturb the delicate military balance in outer space is emblematic of something sinister and dangerous. Partly because of the patronizing pampering afforded the Chinese by the developed world, and partly because of Beijing's relentless, but successful, manipulation of world opinion, China has long been treated as being "exceptional" when it comes to its international behavior.
As a result, in venues like the UN, China enjoys a degree of immunity from criticism for its egregious human rights abuses, as well as for its massive military build-up, one that is unparalleled in recent experience. Likewise, China's relations with authoritarian regimes, or even its responsibility for preserving the global environment, are rarely mentioned.
Unsurprisingly, China's pampered leadership now acts as if the country actually is exceptional and can get away with polluting outer space without rebuke. The destruction of the Chinese satellite produced roughly 300,000 pieces of debris, causing severe pollution and putting many other spacecraft in the Earth's orbit in grave danger. We know this because the last and only time anybody "killed" a satellite with a land-based missile was in 1985, when the US destroyed one of its own satellites, creating a slick of debris that took the US government 17 years to clean up.
There is a danger, given China's size, that this peculiar "Chinese Exceptionalism" could turn into something truly alarming: a global norm.
Yu Maochun is a professor of East Asia and Military History at the US Naval Academy. Views expressed here are his own.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath