The issue of Taiwanese independence has become one of world interest. However, the manner in which the story has been developing gives the
impression that it will not be possible to resolve the issue in a way that is acceptable to Taiwan and China.
On the one hand, you have an island where people have developed their own culture, government and technology and the people would like to maintain this and be recognized for these successes and developments as an independent nation. On the other hand, this island -- with historical ties to Japan and the US -- has technologies Beijing would like to get its hands on to further its objectives. Taiwan's strategic alliance with Japan and the US is showing big on the radar screens in Beijing.
An acceptable compromise would perhaps involve recognition of Taiwan as an independent nation in return for a Taiwanese military and technological alliance with China. Just as the US operates with its allies, China and Taiwan would operate joint military bases and synchronize their efforts to ensure security at home.
The benefits to Taiwan would be the following:
* It turns a potentially aggressive neighbor into a protector who can respond quickly.
* It gains access to China's defense manufacturing facilities, allowing Taiwan to develop its own defense technology rather than sending contentiously large amounts of money to foreign powers for the purchase of old technology.
* Taiwan gains universal recognition as an independent nation.
The benefits to China would be:
* One of its neighbors becomes a strong ally.
* It gains access to new technology.
* It expands its world influence, raises its trustworthiness and gains recognition for the the mature way in which it resolved a contentious issue.
If this is successful, other countries might also form alliances with Taiwan and China, thus forming a snowball effect o in securing East Asia.
This is just a seed of an idea, but with proper refinement it could perhaps serve as a basis for improved Taipei-Beijing relations.
John Stewien
South Australia
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath