Instead of serving as a catalyst for change in how businesses and banks are regulated, the Rebar Group scandal has turned into yet another bout of self mutilation for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
After the resignation of Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Shih Jun-ji (
But why should Su step down to take responsibility for the actions of a crooked businessman? And what can the Cabinet do to prevent corrupt individuals from secretly embezzling funds and fleeing the country? To date, no one has come up with an answer for either of these questions.
In their clamor to find a fall guy, people have overlooked the fact that the swift action taken by Su and his Cabinet brought an immediate end to any adverse effects the scandal was having on investor confidence and the nation's financial markets.
And thankfully, all the speculation about Su's future was deflated on Sunday when the president gave the premier his full backing.
So where did the hullabaloo about the premier stepping down originate?
It stemmed largely from two sources. First, the pro-China pan-blue media, which circle like vultures waiting for the slightest hint of a problem, ready to discredit the government, criticize politicians and demand their resignations. They are almost too ravenous in their hunger to peck at Su, the person viewed by the opposition as the DPP's strongest candidate for the 2008 presidential election.
The effectiveness of these organizations in shaping the direction of local news cannot be underestimated. This has been exemplified by the way the focus has quickly been diverted onto the government and who should go rather than the systemic flaws that allowed the scandal to happen and the illegal behavior of Rebar Group founder Wang You-theng (
But the second and by far the largest culprit is the DPP itself, with party infighting at the root of the whole episode.
Despite passing a resolution last July aimed at dissolving the party's many factions, internal rivalries still exist and it is these that are aiding the opposition in working to topple Su.
It goes without saying that members of the former Welfare State Faction and supporters of former Kaohsiung mayor Frank Hsieh (
But Su is a strong character and the latest rumors are like water off a duck's back. However, the individuals who started such rumors and untruths should be aware that their gossip-mongering is damaging the party.
The DPP has endured a torrid time in the media since assuming power, with various corruption cases and scandals making the headlines. The party's standing and image as an alternative to the previous regime has taken a hit in the minds of the electorate. More bad press will only cause more harm to the party.
What the DPP needs in the run up to next year's presidential election is a period of stability.
But as long as the big four -- Su, Hsieh, Vice President Annette Lu (
If the party's leaders had any clue, they would put an end to all this and choose a candidate for 2008 as soon as possible before the party does itself some serious damage.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing