Why has the Control Yuan been unattended for such a long time?
The Constitution says that the Control Yuan has the powers to impeach, censure or audit all government officials -- even the president and vice president.
Why would the pan-blue camp, which is attempting to depose President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), render the Control Yuan ineffective by refusing to ratify the president's nominees?
The pan-blues have the majority in the Legislative Yuan and Chen's list of nominees is required by law to consist of candidates recommended by all major parties proportion with their representation in the Legislative Yuan.
In fact, some pan-blue supporters were quite baffled by the KMT's choice to turn down Chen's list.
However, given the KMT' s much more advanced political skills, it is hardly surprising that the pan-blue camp would make such decision.
If the Control Yuan were fully staffed and functional, then the Legislative Yuan would not be able to take advantage of the Control Yuan's power and authority -- including the power to set up an internal investigation council to investigate the 2004 presidential election.
With a majority in the Legislative Yuan, this is exactly what the pan-blue camp wants.
With such power, they could continuously cause problems for the political system.
President Chen and his government may have committed some deeds that require the public's attention.
But the Control Yuan is a very important branch for checking the power of government officials and combatting corruption.
It is simply unacceptable and outrageous that politicians can manipulate the political system in this way for their own benefit.
The president has decided to submit another list of nominees for the Control Yuan.
The protests against Chen have died down. It is now time for the pan-blue camp to act honorably.
Yue-Jia Liu
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing