We might be in East Asia and not North America, but a wave of Puritanism is sweeping the land -- and I, for one, am wondering where it will all end. The media witch hunt is currently going after sex and drugs, which means rock 'n' roll can't be far behind. Wu Bai (伍佰) and Chthonic, consider yourselves warned.
Before you know it, our overlords of morality in the media will campaign against dancing -- though as anyone who has witnessed foreign businessmen jiggling their beer guts on the bar at Carnegie's can tell you, a crackdown might be a blessing.
It all started with tearful apologies from celebrities Chu Chung-heng (屈中恆) and Tuo Tsung-kang (庹宗康), who admitted to using pot and then trying to cover it up.
Now, it seems like every day another minor celebrity appears on some talkshow to blubber a confession about their drug-addled binges and bow deeply to the cameras. Apparently everyone in the entertainment industry is popping ketamine, smoking doobies, snorting cocaine or Hoovering hash -- and setting a baaaad example for the nation's tots.
Chu told cable television station CTI that he decided to tell the truth "so that I could face my daughter and family ... and not live under a shadow for the rest of my life."
Earth to Chu: You smoked a joint. You didn't burn down an elementary school with kiddies trapped inside.
Then the Apple Daily upped the ante in this festival of nice-versus-vice with a report on three DPP politicians and a presidential aide who were photographed leaving a Taipei zhaodaisuo (
That set off a firestorm of righteous indignation. But even better, it gave TV stations and newspapers an excuse to run a saliva-caked expose on "guesthouse culture" or "a day in the life of a lamei," complete with close-up video footage (albeit strategically pixilated) and provocative photos. It must have been a good week for ratings and circulation.
At least the DPP politicos came up with creative excuses -- unlike the dissolute TV celebrities, not one of whom managed so much as a "but I didn't inhale."
First prize goes to DPP Legislator Yu Jan-daw (
Clearly, part of the outrage is that guesthouses are part of a male-only world of backroom schmoozing -- where plentiful booze and sexy escorts are used to soften up a client or politician and seal a business deal or "cooperation."
But why the exclusive attention on weak-willed men? After all, it's not like Taiwan doesn't have similar entertainment for women -- they're called niulangdian (
I eagerly await the day when Next magazine publishes photos of someone like true-blue talking head Sisy Chen (陳文茜) staggering out of a niulangdian at 4am with a young male escort in tow sporting died yellow hair and an unbuttoned-to-the-navel shirt.
And for the sake of ideological equality, what about tailing DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (
At any rate, there's a habit far more dangerous to one's health and reputation than late-night gallivanting or recreational drug use: running for office with the KMT.
Let this be a lesson to the nation's youngsters. Take up this insidious habit, and you could end up like Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Wang suffered that misfortune last week after Lien's plans for a four-man gabfest, which was to include fellow pan-blue diva James Soong (
And even that pales with another fate: coming down with the debilitating H5NSheng virus. As I said last week, this alarming disease initially took the form of a highly quotable, foreign media-friendly political analyst known as Emile Sheng (
Now, Taiwanese scientists' worst fears have been confirmed: The virus is capable of media-to-government transmission. Sheng has been named chairman of the research, development and evaluation commission in the office of incoming Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (
And it may not end there: if the KMT comes to power in 2008 and global health officials fail to take preventive action, this pestilence could even spread to the Presidential Office.
With threats such as this menacing the nation, why is everyone so upset about a little weed and womanizing?
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS