Although the mayoral elections in Kaohsiung and Taipei have ended, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Huang Chun-ying (
For Huang, defeat by just 1,114 votes is hard to swallow, as pre-election polls showed he was ahead by a solid 20 percent. Therefore, his decision to file a lawsuit and demand a vote recount is understandable and in accordance with the Election and Recall Law (
When the results are this close, being able to certify the winner and loser via a legally mandated recount can only help bring harmony to Kaohsiung's political landscape.
Although Huang's decision to file a lawsuit or demand a vote recount is acceptable, he has not helped his credibility by bringing forward a "witness" who claimed that votes had been miscounted and that duplicate voting notices had been mailed.
First, KMT Legislator Lwo Shih-hsiung (
Second, some of Huang's supporters accused polling station No. 160 at Lunghua Junior High School of incorrectly recording Chen's final vote count as 747 instead of 474, which would have given her 273 more ballots than she actually received. But this proved to be another unfounded accusation, as the number "474" had been clearly written on the blackboard and on the ballot bag at the station. This was later confirmed by the CEC, rebutting claims that there had been any wrongdoing.
Taiwan has held elections since the Japanese era. Although they were fraught with vote buying and government manipulation during KMT rule, society has gradually come to accept that elections have become independent and impartial. With political parties and candidates now closely monitored, mistakes are possible, but there isn't much opportunity for illegal misconduct. Everyone can understand the Huang camp request for a recount. But it's unacceptable for people to use incorrect or fabricated evidence to make false accusations and stir up tensions.
Pan-blue candidates Lien Chan (
A repetition of this in Kaohsiung should be avoided at all costs. The CEC should declare Chen the winner according to its administrative procedures so that the city can get back to business as usual. At the same time, the courts should handle Huang's lawsuit, and if necessary, overturn the results according to legal procedures.
Taiwan already has a legal model for handling election disputes. It doesn't need politicians turning close results into an excuse to fan controversy.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)