Although the mayoral elections in Kaohsiung and Taipei have ended, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Huang Chun-ying (
For Huang, defeat by just 1,114 votes is hard to swallow, as pre-election polls showed he was ahead by a solid 20 percent. Therefore, his decision to file a lawsuit and demand a vote recount is understandable and in accordance with the Election and Recall Law (
When the results are this close, being able to certify the winner and loser via a legally mandated recount can only help bring harmony to Kaohsiung's political landscape.
Although Huang's decision to file a lawsuit or demand a vote recount is acceptable, he has not helped his credibility by bringing forward a "witness" who claimed that votes had been miscounted and that duplicate voting notices had been mailed.
First, KMT Legislator Lwo Shih-hsiung (
Second, some of Huang's supporters accused polling station No. 160 at Lunghua Junior High School of incorrectly recording Chen's final vote count as 747 instead of 474, which would have given her 273 more ballots than she actually received. But this proved to be another unfounded accusation, as the number "474" had been clearly written on the blackboard and on the ballot bag at the station. This was later confirmed by the CEC, rebutting claims that there had been any wrongdoing.
Taiwan has held elections since the Japanese era. Although they were fraught with vote buying and government manipulation during KMT rule, society has gradually come to accept that elections have become independent and impartial. With political parties and candidates now closely monitored, mistakes are possible, but there isn't much opportunity for illegal misconduct. Everyone can understand the Huang camp request for a recount. But it's unacceptable for people to use incorrect or fabricated evidence to make false accusations and stir up tensions.
Pan-blue candidates Lien Chan (
A repetition of this in Kaohsiung should be avoided at all costs. The CEC should declare Chen the winner according to its administrative procedures so that the city can get back to business as usual. At the same time, the courts should handle Huang's lawsuit, and if necessary, overturn the results according to legal procedures.
Taiwan already has a legal model for handling election disputes. It doesn't need politicians turning close results into an excuse to fan controversy.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers