The car accident involving Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (
The number of people in Taiwan killed and injured in traffic accidents over the past 10 years stands out among other social indicators, along with the crime rate.
According to figures from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (主計處), there were 5,929 deaths and injuries from traffic accidents in 1996. By 2000, that number had risen sharply to 70,283.
Since then, it has continued to soar by double-digit growth rates, until last year it reached 205,981, or nine people in 1,000 being injured or killed in car accidents.
However, things are very different in neighboring countries.
China's economic growth in recent years has spurred road construction and the desire to travel under one's own power, which in turn has led to a rise in traffic accidents. Every year more than 100,000 people die in car accidents -- the highest in the world. Every five minutes, someone dies on the road and every minute someone becomes disabled as a result of a traffic accident.
No wonder reports by the WHO say that China is one of the most dangerous countries in the world for drivers and pedestrians alike.
China's traffic conditions have no doubt made an impression on any Taiwanese who has seen them firsthand.
Hong Kong and Japan, however, are model examples. Everyone is aware that Hong Kong has many cars for its relatively few roads, but visitors there have certainly noticed that Hong Kong drivers are mindful of traffic laws and remain very alert while on the road. This is what has kept the city's bustling traffic from degenerating into chaos.
Hong Kong traffic is among the densest in the world, and yet Hong Kong remains one of the safest cities to drive in. Only 0,23 people per 1,000 die in car accidents there every year.
The Japanese may even be more law-abiding drivers than people in Hong Kong.
In Japan, one will discover that almost nobody steps on the gas or stops in the crosswalk when the light turns red. Nor is this the exception, but the rule.
With around 80 million cars across the country, Japan is the world's kingdom of cars. With its economy on the rise in 1970 it experienced 16,000 traffic fatalities. In the last few years, with its economy going in the opposite direction as that of Taiwan, traffic deaths have been declining. Last year they fell to just 6,871 -- the lowest in 40 years.
Media reports said that Shaw's accident was caused by someone incorrectly trying to pass on the outside shoulder.
In the West and in Japan, it is customary for cars to pass on the innermost lane, be it on a two-lane or a three-lane road. Unless there is traffic, when a car approaches from behind, the car in front must make way by moving to the right.
Taiwan still hasn't established such driving ethics.
Taiwanese drivers have grown accustomed to staying planted in the left inside lane, perhaps in an attempt to avoid the large trucks and tour buses on the outside. However, this means that overtaking cars have become used to passing on the right.
Most Taiwanese drivers on the highway don't worry about what others are doing or look in their rear-view mirrors as frequently as they should. Drivers on the inside lane often don't see the cars approaching from behind, so the overtaking cars flash their headlights or honk.
Obviously, Taiwan's many traffic accidents cannot all be explained by the problem of passing on the right. It's not only a surface problem with legal standards, but also stems from people's acceptance of a culture of superficiality.
Traffic accidents are the byproduct of a civilization of modern technology. The Taiwanese have become drunk with the notion of material success and some have taken the view that pursuing economic wealth will make them civilized people.
However, this kind of superficial view of life is in need of reflection and adjustment. Perhaps our political leaders need to take a step back from the myth of economic growth and think.
Establishing a system of morality and ethics for the modern age is also an indispensable element in Taiwan's march toward becoming a more civilized nation.
Eugene Chiu is the chair of the Department of History at Tunghai University.
Translated by Marc Langer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing