We've all met them, the "Photo Negative" couples, who seem the very opposite of each other, to the point where you can't imagine how they ever got together. The deafening drama queen with the waxwork boyfriend whose main purpose in life is to refill her glass and ensure she doesn't lose her handbag. The gregarious man with the wife who nibbles, mouse-like, at the periphery of conversation. The athletic jock appearing in the pub with a bookworm.
Of course, sometimes it's obvious. For instance, the astonishing "connection" found between "Beautiful Young Women" and "Rich Old Guys." But what do all the other "Photo Negatives" see in each other? Doesn't it go against the rules of attraction to have no common ground at all? Or is that the point?
Yoked as we all are to the tyranny of "shared interests", gasping in the airless hell of lonely hearts-speak, are we all in danger of ending up with the non-biologically related equivalent of our sister or brother? Indeed, could sometimes not being reminded of yourself (boring, noisy and messy) be the biggest turn-on of all?
A TV series started this week in the UK called Dating The Enemy (DTE). What's this, I thought suspiciously, a summary of every relationship I've ever had? As it happens, DTE puts together couples who have nothing in common and hate the idea of each other in the hope that opposites attract. So it was a summary of every relationship I've ever had.
Except perhaps that, like most people, the more "challenging" aspects of my personal emotional Chernobyls were to be found less in what we didn't have in common, than in what we did. Namely a near-feudal scrabbling for territory and power that in men manifests itself in Siberic levels of emotional withdrawal, and in women as crying a lot to Joni Mitchell and smashing wine glasses. But enough of the good old days.
Famous "Photo Negative" couples are thin on the ground -- for it to work, one of them would have to be shy, retiring and sane. But look at Brangelina (after Billy Bob, Angelina's probably relieved Brad doesn't feel the vampiric urge to wear a vial of her blood around his neck). Kurt and Courtney -- was it my imagination, or did Cobain often seem enthralled by the sheer "trouble" of her?
When Madonna and Guy met, they were cut from the same ruthless, driven cloth. Now, after Swept Away and Kabbalah, he is a real-ale-supping shadow of his former self, scoring high on "Photo Negativity," and probably all kinds of other negativity, too.
Then there is Renee Zellweger, the "Queen of the Photo Negative" coupling: Jim Carrey, Jack White of the White Stripes, that weird marriage to the scary looking chap in the stetson, and now rumored to be back with old flame George Clooney (the heart-throb famous for only wanting to commit to his pet pig).
Renee has either dedicated her entire love life to the concept of opposites attracting, or she has loads in common with all these men, and hence is a much stranger -- and braver -- woman than she lets on.
Maybe that's the point. Some people don't have the guts to investigate the vagaries of opposites attracting. That's why we deal in what appears to be an endless parade of "familiars".
I, like many women, have specialized in partners who are really just manifestations of myself (the same faults and the same good points).
So, maybe going out with "familiars" is a good thing -- my true opposite would be a teetotal, quiet chap, who didn't stink of smoke, or find the TV series Peep Show remotely funny (I'm sorry, but I don't fancy him one bit).
Or maybe I'm missing a trick. After all, at the other end of the spectrum, you get people like Renee, who are so good at being jigsaws they can always find a piece that matches yours. A piece of your "blue sky" that goes with their "white cloud." Just well enough that the picture (one neither of them has seen before) can eventually appear.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath