Out of the blue, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator John Chiang (
In his outburst at a legislative committee session, Chiang, the son of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (CCK,
Many people wondered what lay behind his outburst. After all, the airport was originally called the Taoyuan Airport before its name was changed in sycophantic homage to the late dictator. And John Chiang himself is no stranger to changing appellations. He changed his name from Chang to Chiang just a few years ago, after the death of CCK's widow -- despite complaints from some members of the Chiang family. So why can't the name of the country's main airport revert to its original?
John Chiang was obviously upset over the efforts of the Democratic Progressive Party government to remove the remaining traces of the rule of his grandfather, Chiang Kai-shek (CKS,
CKS was adamant in his campaign to "stamp out the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]," yet who is now a frequent visitor to the other side of the Taiwan Strait? CCK was firm in his insistence on the "three noes" -- no negotiating, no compromising and no contact with the CCP -- yet who is noted for busily shaking hands with ranking CCP officials?
John Chiang published his autobiography, titled The Kid Outside the Chiang Family's Door, and in a nod to his new-found friends across the Strait it was published in both traditional and simplified character versions. But it wasn't just the characters that changed in the version intended for China.
John Chiang self-censored almost all the key words in his text for the Chinese version, such as addressing his father as "Mr. Ching-kuo" instead of "President Ching-kuo" and "President Chiang [Kai-shek]" to "Mr. Chiang Senior."
Here is someone who is willing to censor his own biography and downgrade his own father and grandfather to curry favor with China's rulers. So who is he to point the finger at Taiwan for changing the name of an airport?
Although both CKS and CCK were criticized for their authoritarian rule in Taiwan, at least they made it clear that Taiwan formed the basis of their government; that without Taiwan, there was no Republic of China (ROC). Both of them also stressed their determination to "safeguard the ROC."
John Chiang, on the other hand, has been promoting the opening of the three links under the so-called "1992 consensus" and Beijing's "one China" principle.
If he cares so much about the removal of his grandfather's name from the airport, he should care just as much about the principles established by his father and grandfather instead of trying to make friends with those whose ambition it is to "eliminate the ROC."
John Chiang clearly has identity issues. Sadly, many of Taiwan's problems stem from the fact that it is full of people like him.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath