Former Democratic Progres-sive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
The leaders of Shih's movement, after trying to build the facade of being anti-corruption are finding that the burden of transparency is revealing the cracks in their own mirror image. The sensation-hungry media has turned its attention to the much more promising Taipei mayoral race. However, in the aftermath of all this, there remains the challenging question of Shih's motivation and its residue of uncomplimentary interpretations like grandiose, schizophrenic, hypocritical, maudlin and pawn.
Grandiose, Shih has relied on the pan-blue media to promote his grandiose scheme to attack President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). Shih promised much in the pan-blue media, but despite the hype he never delivered. Review the numbers. The grass roots March of a Million? At best it was 360,000 and this in the 2 million strong pan-blue strongholds of Taipei and Taipei County.
The One Million Voices Speaking Out donation campaign (where individuals gave NT$100 apiece to record their distain for Chen)? The books demonstrating input receipts (not expenditures) have yet to be made public. There has never been an accurate verification of where all the money came from. It just appeared, and not long after Shih had a meeting in Thailand with the fugitive tycoon Chen Yu-hao (
After the media touted Shih's March of a Million (make that 360,000) Shih grandiosely predicted he would fill Taipei with 1.5 to 2 million people in protest. This too never materialized. Despite full media coverage, the turnout proved to be even less than the 360,000 (March of a Million). Police estimated this second "siege" of the Presidential Office attracted around 120,000 people; the pan-blue media after wild claims later more realistically placed it at 300,000.
One public benefit that did occur however was the pressure for transparency on Shih's campaign funds. Sixty million of the NT$110 million had been spent. Further, one half of that pool had been spent on advertising. Coincidentally, Jerry Fan (范可欽), the spokesman of Shih's campaign also runs an advertising company. Did Fan submit a competitive tender for his slice of over NT$30 million in advertising business? Not on your life.
Others call Shih schizophrenic. Shih claims he wants to be remembered as the suffering servant but he exhibits dreams of being Il Duce. No one denies the years he spent in prison; but even then was his motivation for Taiwan alone or for the limelight of leadership? For those that know him, he can only live with the image of being the leader and hence the beginning of his conflicts with Chen in the DPP. Did he not in the past try to develop a controlling leadership in the legislature including an alliance with the New Party? Is this part of what led him to take his football and go to play in the blue camp where the pay was better?
In recent months, a split personality continues to emerge. Shih enjoys the rhetoric of war. He repeatedly speaks of his armies laying siege to the Presidential Office. Photos display him atop a truck speaking through loud speakers. It is the image of a revolutionary in a banana republic setting out to topple the government. Fantasy or dream, Shih nevertheless insults Taiwan by suggesting that its government can be toppled like that of a tinpot dictatorship.
Shih then does a mood swing and speaks of peace and harmony. After talk of storming the gates and after using two-way radios to communicate directions to his troops -- copying the method used by Rwanda's leaders to tell their death squads where to attack -- Shih goes into reverse and says that harmony is his goal. His enemies are the ones who are persecuting him; they are destabilizing the republic.
The line between being schizophrenic and hypocritical is thin. Those that see Shih as a hypocrite point out how he ignores the corruption of those who are in league with him; he tries to avoid responsibility for his own corrupt and irresponsible past; he remains silent on the corruption of those who have paid his bills. In the past when it was time to stand up for Taiwan against China's "Anti-Secession" law, Shih was nowhere to be seen.
The hypocritical image blends with the maudlin. While his followers baked in the hot sun, or chilled in the late evening watches, Shih often retired to his trailer like an aging soap opera star. Supposedly his health was not up to the strain, though he pledged he would die for Taiwan. This was unusual and contrary behavior for one who had built a reputation for being able to party hard and would spend the wee hours of the morning carousing with friends. Even now, some even reported him spending vigil time in a piano bar.
Was Shih a pawn of the pan-blue party to whom he had become financially indebted? Some think so. There were photos of him between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Grandiose, schizophrenic, hypocritical, maudlin or pawn, yet others see Shih as a tragic figure seeking redemption for the wasted eight years of his life. Certainly he arouses the pity and fear that was the purpose of Greek tragedy. Pity, because perhaps the fault may not be entirely of his making; fear because if it could happen to one who first went to prison for democracy, his betrayal of democracy could happen to others.
The drama plays on, but the red shirts have now been relegated to a supporting role. And as for the NT$110 million, the scramble for the remaining NT$50 million is already taking place behind the scenes. The media is turning its attention to the Taipei mayoral race, so a million here and a million there will start to slip between the cracks. Fan will continue to make claims that there will be strict accountability; a token amount will probably be given to charity for appearances sake. Then the remainder will be spent on advertising declaring what a success the movement has been.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taiwan.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath