The recent proposal by more than 70 legislators that the nation's capital be moved from Taipei to southern or central Taiwan will probably be difficult to implement, since Taipei is the most affluent city in Taiwan. Nevertheless, it is still a very interesting topic to talk about.
In many nations, the capital is not the biggest commercial city. This is true of the US and Turkey.
In Turkey, Ankara, once a dusty little town, is the capital city rather than colorful and vibrant Istanbul. Istanbul was the capital until 1919, when the Turkish War of Independence broke out and Istanbul was occupied by Allied forces from Britain, France, Italy and Greece, forcing Turkish forces to set up an interim government in Ankara.
At the war's end, the Turkish government decided to keep the capital in Ankara. Because its capital was uprooted as a result of the war, it is difficult to compare Turkey's case with the proposal to move Taiwan's capital.
Another possible model for Taiwan to follow separates the capital and the seat of government in different cities. There are now nine countries in the world -- including the Netherlands and South Africa -- where this is the case.
The capital city of the Netherlands is Amsterdam, but the Hague is the seat of government and the home town of the royal family. Amsterdam is thus the country's constitutional capital.
In South Africa, Johannesburg is the biggest city, but the government is divided between three cities, with the parliament in Cape Town, the government in Tshwane and the Supreme Court of Appeals in Bloemfontein.
Although such a separation of the capital and the seat of government is rare, it could help a nation's already developed economic center steer clear of political disturbances. This is something that Taiwan could consider.
A somewhat more extreme model is Switzerland, which has no capital city. Prior to 1848, Switzerland was a federation of cantons led by a group of princes. The seat of the Swiss parliament rotated between once every two years and the country thus did not have a central federal capital.
In 1848, the Swiss voted in a national referendum to decide if all national government agencies should to be located in one city, and Zurich, Bern and Lausanne were listed as choices. Bern was eventually chosen to host the country's parliament, Zurich was given the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and Lausanne got the judiciary.
After much legislation and restructuring, Switzerland's federal government agencies are now spread over three cities. Although Bern is officially called the capital city of Switzerland, in practice the country does not have a genuine capital city.
The example of Switzerland is worth considering. Because Taiwan is so deeply divided into pan-blue and pan-green camps, it would be worth thinking about whether to emulate Switzerland's previous model. Under this scenario, the nation's capital city would move from city to city once every two years.
Another possibility would be to emulate modern Switzerland and spread government agencies over several cities, placing the presidential office in Taipei, the Cabinet in Taichung and the legislature in Kaohsiung.
According to the Constitution of the Republic of China, the nation's capital is Nanjing, and Taipei is only an interim capital. Even if we relocated the Presidential Office and the legislature to Kinmen or Matsu, the new location would still only be a temporary capital, since the "real" capital is still Nanjing.
Therefore, those who oppose the relocation of the country's capital city shouldn't create too much of a fuss.
Pai Lin is a political commentator based in Austria.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing