"I don't care if the rich get rich. It doesn't bother me. They should get richer. I'm worried about the poor getting poorer and not getting richer. If there are several Bill Gates in the country, I don't care. Lifting the bottom of society is the most important." So said Muhammad Yunus, this year's Nobel Peace Prize winner, in a 1996 article in Britain's the Independent titled The Good Banker.
Yunus' philanthropy as the "poor man's banker" is commendable, and consequently Taiwan's United Daily News (
Perhaps some will say that banks serve their stockholders, and the state serves its politicians. But this editorial came to a different conclusion.
The whole article could have been trimmed to one statement: "Financial institutions have expanded but businesses are quickly going bankrupt and those in deep credit card debt have no way out. The essence of governmental service has been lost!"
If the rapid pace of business bankruptcies and growing numbers of "credit card slaves" are the result of the disappearing essence of government service, then it seems the article's premise is that the banks should serve their card slaves, and the state should serve industry. The entire editorial contains no statistics and simply reads like an attack on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
In fact,Yunus raises a point most worthy of Taiwan's attention: that "lifting the bottom of society is the most important."
What exactly does the bottom of Taiwanese society look like? According to the 2005 Survey of Family Income and Expenditure (
More tragic still was that of those low wage earners, more than half the heads of households were unemployed. Obviously, from the viewpoint of supply and demand, employment opportunities have decreased and the terms of employment have deteriorated. If we further consider Taiwan's foreign investment, we can see that the chief culprit is the shifting of production to China, or, in international diction, the more neutral globalization.
Some Taiwanese scholars have long argued that the three direct links with China are actually a question of class interests, and not a question of political identity. In January, Taiwan Thinktank conducted a survey on cross-strait trade that came to a similar conclusion.
It doesn't seem too far off the mark to further modify that argument to say that cross-strait trade is a question of class interests, and not a question of political identity.
Former Taiwan Confederation of Trade Unions member Lin Thung-hung (林宗弘) once summed up the trends of cross-strait commerce and globalization as the "consolidation of Taiwanese businesses, the marginalization of the working class, and the decline of the middle class."
Taking aim at the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, he accused it of opening the floodgates for Taiwanese investment in China after it gave in at the National Economic Development Advisory Conference in 2001 with its "active opening" policy, adding that Taiwan already has had to deal with the employment crisis that followed excessive economic opening to China and its ineffective management.
Lin's comments may be over the top due to his pro-union stance, but the DPP administration has let the pro-China media lead it by the nose towards a philosophy of "Taiwanese business consolidation."
The working class has clearly suffered the most, and the situation is only deteriorating for the poorest 20 percent of society.
But thanks to alarms sounded by pro-localization media and think tanks, this year's Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development managed to put the brakes on this trend when Premier Su Tseng-chang's (
Applying Yunus' hypothesis, policies centered around cross-strait trade may help the rich get richer, but the most important goal is to help lift those at the bottom of Taiwanese society's ladder. After all, the working class is the DPP's biggest base of support.
Lin Kuo-hua works in the finance industry.
Translated by Jason Cox and Marc Langer
The global chip shortage last year caused an unprecedented supply-chain crisis, affecting many key industries, including the auto industry. Europe, Japan and the US began to realize the indispensability and ubiquitous dominance of Taiwan’s semiconductor manufacturing industry. At the same time, amid the US-China trade war, Beijing’s military aggressions against Taiwan became increasingly blatant and provocative. In light of these developments, Europe, Japan and the US are formulating new policies to rebuild their domestic semiconductor manufacturing base, so as to mitigate the enormous geopolitical and economic risks involved. Last year, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) commanded 56 percent of the global
An April circular by the Chinese Ministry of Education on student admission criteria at Tibetan universities has been harrowing and discriminating to say the least. The circular said that prospective students must state their “political attitude and ideological morality” to be considered for admission. It also said that students should not be involved in religious movements and students who are proficient in Marxist theory should be preferred. Since Beijing started occupying Tibet, it has meticulously introduced policies to dismantle the Tibetan education system, which is closely tied to its rich monastic tradition, and has even pulled students from Afghanistan and eastern
Opinion polls show that Taiwan’s judicial system and law enforcement “enjoy” low approval ratings among Taiwanese. In spite of data showing low crime rates, many Taiwanese drivers have faced aggressive driving, unprovoked road rage, road blocking and unmotivated police officers. Some criminals seem to consider themselves above the law, which is not completely wrong. Reports about so-called “road blocking” can be found in newspapers or on YouTube. An example of this is when “road rowdies” block a vehicle on a road, get out of their vehicle and start to attack the occupants of the blocked vehicle — often attacking in a
When I was teaching in Lesotho in southern Africa during the 1980s, I taught a class on comparative foreign policy. The course included trips to the US embassy, the Soviet embassy, the British embassy and the newly established Chinese embassy. The students could ask the ambassadors and staff questions about foreign policy, and would then write a report as their final term paper. The Chinese ambassador felt that the US-style education I delivered was unique and invited me to go to China to teach. At the time, China was planning to open up to the world, and it needed professors versed