Smokers are finding themselves increasingly unwelcome in public areas throughout Europe as health fears over passive smoking require them to stub it out before entering more and more bars, restaurants and train stations.
Ireland, where smoke-filled pubs were long the center of social life, led the way with a total ban on smoking in public places imposed on March 29, 2004.
Since then Norway (not in the EU), Italy, Malta, Sweden and Scotland have followed suit, with the rest of Britain along with Lithuania set to fall in next year.
To the great surprise of many people, compliance with the public smoking ban in Ireland was running at 94 percent a year after it was introduced. Huddles of hardcore smokers quickly became a common sight puffing away around giant ashtrays placed outside bars.
Ireland's main opposition justice spokesman John Deasy, one of the stubborn 6 percent, was fired by his party leader after he smoked in the members bar of the Irish parliament.
In Rome, Italians wanting to smoke in public since the ban was introduced there in January last year wander out on to terraces and balconies in summer and winter alike.
On Tuesday a French parliamentary commission was due to publish its recommendations on the issue, with a government decision expected next week.
Paris has announced a delay in any legislation to allow bars, bistros and discos to prepare and adapt so that empty ashtrays don't mean empty tills.
Cigarette smoke in restaurants, bars and even hospitals makes France's public spaces among the unhealthiest in the world, according to new research released last week.
In 42 percent of French public spaces, the air quality was ranked as "dangerous" due to high smoke concentrations, said the study conducted by the Lyon-based International Center for Cancer Research and the Roswell Park Cancer Institute.
Only five countries -- Syria, Romania, Lebanon, Belgium and Singapore -- performed worse, according to the 24-nation study, which looked at bars, restaurants and nightclubs, as well as train stations, airports and hospitals.
However in most other EU nations public smoking bans are non-existent or full of holes that leave anti-tobacco campaigners fuming.
Governments throughout the bloc are still having the coffers versus coffins debate, weighing up the undeniable health benefits against the loss of tax revenues from cigarettes and cigars.
Smokers in Lithuania will be dealt a double blow from the start of next year, when they will be banned from smoking in public and will have to pay more for their addiction as tax on tobacco is hiked, a recent press report said.
New EU member Lithuania must increase excise on tobacco, as part of obligations to the bloc, which it joined in 2004. By 2010, excise must make up 57 percent of the price of the most popular brand of smokes in Lithuania, according to EU rules.
In Austria, where 37 percent of adults smoke -- one of the highest rates in the EU, where the average is 27 percent -- there is no ban at all on smoking in bars and restaurants.
In Germany any ban is the responsibility of the restaurateurs, with MPs there last month again deciding not to introduce any binding rules.
In Spain, where an anti-smoking ban has been in place since January, exceptions to the rules have allowed most bars and restaurants to filter out any smoking ban.
A tobacco law which came into effect in Luxembourg this month allows the tiny Grand Duchy's nightclubs to keep smoking while restaurants can have air-filtered smokers' rooms.
Similarly, when Belgium introduces its new law in January, restaurants and cafes will be allowed to keep smoking rooms, although no food or drink will be served in them.
Such fumoirs are set to multiply with the idea also catching alight in France. In Finland special rooms hermetically sealed from the non-smoking outside world are being planned for after a tough new law is introduced in June next year.
Such exceptions to the no-smoking rule are not just favored by restaurant owners who can see their profits going up in smoke. Their customers are also piping up.
According to a European poll taken in May, while most Europeans (63 percent) are strongly in favor of a ban on smoking in offices and other enclosed public places, the majority dips to 56 percent when it comes to restaurants alone.
When the smoking-ban question was limited to bars and cafes just 40 percent of respondents said they were strongly in favor of a total ban.
Faced with such figures, the Czech republic has rolled up some of the anti-smoking measures it introduced last year.
Elsewhere smoking bans are simply ignored, including in Greece, which heads the league table of tobacco smokers (40 percent), and Hungary, where parliamentary deputies still make decisions in smoke-filled rooms.
As yet there is no overriding European legislation to clear the air. Community rules only cover maximum nicotine and tar levels as well as ruling on the size of the health warnings on packets.
But Brussels doesn't rule out further legislation.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath