Ever since the Berlin Conference of 1883, which Belgium's King Leopold II called "the sharing of Africa's cake," the West has assumed exclusive rights over sub-Saharan Africa. But while centuries of struggle to end colonial rule and apartheid have not changed this much, Western influence is now being challenged by China, which likewise covets Africa's rich reserves of minerals and resources.
China is winning goodwill across the continent by tapping into shared anti-colonial resentments -- and by treating the continent seriously. The next meeting, later this year, of the China-Africa Cooperation Forum (CACF), established to promote trade and investment, will include 46 African heads of state, along with China's leaders. In any case, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), Vice President Zeng Qinghong (曾慶紅) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) visit the continent regularly.
China's moves to strengthen its African ties have three objectives: to consolidate secure energy and mineral supplies, to curtail Taiwan's influence on the continent, and to augment China's burgeoning global authority.
China has invested billions of dollars in African oil production, mining, transportation, electricity production and transmission, telecommunications and other infrastructure. In 2004 alone, China's foreign direct investment in Africa represented US$900 million of the continent's total of US$15 billion.
Chinese representatives disbursed almost US$2.3 billion to acquire a 45 percent stake in one of Nigeria's offshore oil fields and promised to invest an additional US$2.25 billion to develop the reserves. Angola, which currently exports 25 percent of its oil production to China, was granted a US$2 billion loan in exchange for a contract to supply China 10,000 barrels of oil per day.
Sudan, which supplies 7 percent of China's total oil imports, has benefited from the largest Chinese investments. The China National Petroleum Corporation holds a 40 percent stake in the Greater Nile Petroleum Company and has invested US$3 billion in refinery and pipeline construction. Moreover, 4,000 People Liberation Army troops were deployed in southern Sudan to guard an oil pipeline.
Trade figures tell a similar story of growing influence. Sino-African trade grew by 700 percent during the 1990s, doubled between 2000 and 2003 to US$18.5 billion, and then jumped to US$32.2 billion in the first 10 months of last year. While trade and investment ties with China helped boost the continent's overall economic growth to a record-high 5.2 percent last year, China also canceled US$10 billion in bilateral debts from African countries.
Yet closer relations have brought controversy. African countries have become large buyers of Chinese weapons and military equipment. In so unstable a continent saturated with weaponry, pouring in more guns is hardly welcome. Yet, as Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister Zhou Wenzhong (
Of greater long-term concern is the support that China provides for Africa's authoritarian rulers. Growth without social justice merely prolongs the denial of decent living conditions to the majority of Africa's people for the benefit of a tiny rich minority.
The fact that China has, within a decade, overhauled Africa's balance of power, relegating the US and the UK to third and fourth place and challenging France for first place as the continent's main economic and commercial partner, has irked these competitors. France has stepped up its monitoring of China's African activities. To tie Europe closer to Africa, British Prime Minister Tony Blair even proposed eliminating the EU's agricultural subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy.
Africa is the world's only remaining "soft target" where outside powers can battle it out for access to mineral resources. But the last thing Africa needs is to be a battleground in an economic and political war. As Africans know from past experience, countries have no friends, only interests.
The ongoing Darfur conflict illustrates the problem. Despite its declared commitment to non-interference, China's interests in Sudanese oil imply otherwise. Thus, China threatens to veto any resolution of the UN Security Council that might impose sanctions against the Arab ruling class in the Sudanese government, whose troops and government-allied militias are perpetrating genocide against Sudan's black citizens, using Chinese-made helicopter gunships based at airstrips maintained by Chinese oil companies.
Until China sees its economic interests in Africa as tied to the continent's political development, such horrors will continue. Africa's economy may grow, but Africans will continue to suffer.
Sanou Mbaye is a Senegalese economist and a former member of the African Development Bank's senior management team.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath