The saddest thing about Taiwanese politics is that when most politicians point their fingers at someone, they fail to see that other fingers are pointing back.
Especially for those who have their eyes on the 2008 presidential election, the campaign to oust President Chen Shui-bian (
Among them, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) obsessive and continuing use of double standards to score political points has finally backfired.
The following are some examples of Ma's flip-flops:
When first lady Wu Shu-jen (
However, when former Taitung County commissioner Wu Chun-li (
Ma's ambiguous attitude toward People First Party Chairman James Soong's (
When incumbent Keelung Mayor Hsu Tsai-li (
As a lame-duck mayor of Taipei City, most citizens are not impressed by Ma's performance. His relatively high approval rate is due to his personal image, rather that the efficiency of his team.
The decline of internal discipline within the city government has been lost on no one. The latest abuse of power by the director of the Research and Examination Department, Chou Wen-tsai (
Ditto for Ma's use of his executive budget for private affairs. His inability to provide any kind of explanation raises the prospect of corrupt dealings in the mayor's office.
As the anti-corruption sentiment grows amid the campaign to depose Chen, Ma's soft approach to dealing with Hsu was slap him on the wrist. He has applied a blatant double standard to be "harsher on his enemy and softer on his own men," which calls into question his ability and qualifications to be the next national leader.
Indecisiveness in decision making, failure to execute internal discipline, use of double-standards for political ends and a marked tendency toward opportunism are the sum total of Ma's character.
A mirror has two faces. When Ma urged the public to hold a national referendum to force Chen to step down, he must remind himself that he has been walking on the same path that Chen set foot on when he overlooked increasing public dissatisfaction with his performance.
The public insists that leaders fulfill their promises, be consistent with policy and be honest. Instead of molding his public image, the favored contender for president in 2008 must bring strength of character, integrity and consistency to the nation's problems.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath